2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2013.08.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The C-Terminal Domain of Rpb1 Functions on Other RNA Polymerase II Subunits

Abstract: SUMMARY The C-terminal domain (CTD) of Rpb1, the largest subunit of RNA polymerase II (RNApII), coordinates recruitment of RNA- and chromatin-modifying factors to transcription complexes. It is unclear whether the CTD communicates with the catalytic core region of Rpb1 and thus must be physically connected, or instead can function as an independent domain. To address this question, CTD was transferred to other RNApII subunits. Fusions to Rpb4 or Rpb6, two RNApII subunits located near the original position of C… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The CTD path leading to TFIIK explains why Mediator enhances the rate of phosphorylation by TFIIH in vitro (Kim et al, 1994). Further consistent with the structure, splicing the CTD onto either Rpb4 or Rpb6 near its point of exit from the surface of the wild type enzyme rescued a lethal Rpb1-ΔCTD phenotype in yeast, whereas splicing onto Rpb9, on the opposite side of the enzyme, failed to rescue the lethal phenotype (Suh et al, 2013). These CTD variants, which contained a modified linker region, showed diminished levels of phosphorylation by TFIIK, possibly due to an influence of linker length and topology on the kinetics of CTD phosphorylation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…The CTD path leading to TFIIK explains why Mediator enhances the rate of phosphorylation by TFIIH in vitro (Kim et al, 1994). Further consistent with the structure, splicing the CTD onto either Rpb4 or Rpb6 near its point of exit from the surface of the wild type enzyme rescued a lethal Rpb1-ΔCTD phenotype in yeast, whereas splicing onto Rpb9, on the opposite side of the enzyme, failed to rescue the lethal phenotype (Suh et al, 2013). These CTD variants, which contained a modified linker region, showed diminished levels of phosphorylation by TFIIK, possibly due to an influence of linker length and topology on the kinetics of CTD phosphorylation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…Rpb4 was chosen because the Rpb4-Rpb7 “stalk” protrudes away from the Pol II core, close to the presumed position of the CTD. This should be an acceptable location for CTD binding proteins, as the CTD itself can be transferred from Rpb1 to Rpb4 without loss of function (Suh et al, 2013). Unfortunately, Rpb4 fused to full-length Set1 was unstable (Fig 5A, lane 7), consistent with observations that Set1 levels are kept low through protein degradation signals in the N-terminal domains (Soares et al, 2014).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, the CTD can be relocated to other Pol II subunits and still support viability, provided the CTD remains on the same face of Pol II (Suh et al, 2013). This observation suggests that the CTD must be spatially coordinated with other Pol II domains located at defined positions on the surface of Pol II and supports the hypothesis that a dual CTD-Pol II body interface supports termination factor recruitment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%