1973
DOI: 10.1016/s0015-7368(73)70828-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Calculation of Discriminating Power for a Series of Correlated Attributes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
44
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 151 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…T I m and DH I m denote the temperature and enthalpy of melting measured in the first heating ramp, T c and DH c are the temperature and enthalpy of crystallization, T II m and DH II m are the melting temperature and enthalpy measured in the second heating ramp. pairs over the number of possible pairs [17]. The DP of IR spectroscopy was 0.60.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…T I m and DH I m denote the temperature and enthalpy of melting measured in the first heating ramp, T c and DH c are the temperature and enthalpy of crystallization, T II m and DH II m are the melting temperature and enthalpy measured in the second heating ramp. pairs over the number of possible pairs [17]. The DP of IR spectroscopy was 0.60.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To quantify the discriminating power (DP) of the technique, the approach of Smalldon and Moffat was applied, i.e. the ratio between the number of differentiated pairs over the number of possible pairs was calculated [20]: Four sample pairs, i.e. J and Q, J and P, N and P and I and O had indistinguishable R A and R B values, within the experimental error.…”
Section: Samplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The discriminating power (DP) of each of the considered features was calculated as the ratio between the number of differentiated pairs over the number of possible pairs [21]. Sixty-four and 75% of all possible sample pairs could be distinguished if the crystallinity in the parallel or perpendicular direction, respectively, was taken into account.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%