1937
DOI: 10.1085/jgp.20.4.575
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Calibration of Diffusion Membranes and the Calculation of Molecular Volumes From Diffusion Coefficients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

1942
1942
1966
1966

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The temperature was determined with a Beckman thermometer calibrated against a Bureau of Standards thermometer. The diffusion ceils and the shells which hold them were similar to those previously described (1)(2)(3). The cell constants were obtained with n / l HC1 and confirmed with 0.5 per cent pepsin.…”
Section: Description Of Diffusion Apparatussupporting
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The temperature was determined with a Beckman thermometer calibrated against a Bureau of Standards thermometer. The diffusion ceils and the shells which hold them were similar to those previously described (1)(2)(3). The cell constants were obtained with n / l HC1 and confirmed with 0.5 per cent pepsin.…”
Section: Description Of Diffusion Apparatussupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Certain variables associated with the measurement of the sedimentation and diffusion coefficients were therefore cancelled out. For the measurement of the diffusion coefficient of DNA transforming activity, it was necessary because of the small diffusion coefficient of DNA to turn to the use of the Northrop-Anson porous disc method (1)(2)(3). This method has proved to be reliable for proteins of molecular weight 60,000, but the molecular weights of DNA are considerably greater and the asymmetry of the molecules is relatively enormous.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An approximate estimate of the size and uniformity of the split products is conveniently obtained by measuring the diffusion coefficient of the digested material. The method of Northrop and Anson (1929) (see also Anson and Northrop, 1937) has been employed for this purpose.…”
Section: Increase In Ultraviolet Light Absorptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is possible if (1) <s% = 0, in which case one is dealing with a monodisperse solution; {2) <ji « ci ; or (3) c2 « Ci . Case (2) implies that, as mentioned, at a given distance, x, the observed refractive-index gradient is due only to the first component and is zero for the second component. Case (8) implies merely that the concentration of the second component is altogether too small to give rise to a measurable refractive-index gradient.…”
Section: (B) Polydisperse Systemsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…those of the two components. Such a comparison is made in table2 for the case in which the diffusion constant of the single substance, s/Do, is equal to ^^, The change in maximum ordinate is again expressed i v i d u a l n o t d i r e c t l y a s s o c i a t e d w i t h s c i t e i s p r o h i b i t e d .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%