The Wiley‐Blackwell Handbook of Transpersonal Psychology 2013
DOI: 10.1002/9781118591277.ch3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Calling to a Spiritual Psychology: Should Transpersonal Psychology Convert?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…I have lamented these dynamics at length in other publications (e.g., Friedman, 2002, 2015b), as have others who also advocate for a secular spirituality compatible with a transpersonal perspective (e.g., Walach, 2017). I have also speculated that it might be better, given the widespread success of spirituality studies within contemporary psychology, for transpersonal psychology to simply change its name to spiritual psychology and be done with its struggles to overcome its marginalization (Hartelius, Friedman, & Pappas, 2015). However, I think surrendering its title to the even more problematic subdiscipline of spiritual psychology would result in a serious loss of transpersonal psychology’s unique potential to develop as a science devoid of supernatural baggage.…”
Section: Defining Transpersonal Psychologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…I have lamented these dynamics at length in other publications (e.g., Friedman, 2002, 2015b), as have others who also advocate for a secular spirituality compatible with a transpersonal perspective (e.g., Walach, 2017). I have also speculated that it might be better, given the widespread success of spirituality studies within contemporary psychology, for transpersonal psychology to simply change its name to spiritual psychology and be done with its struggles to overcome its marginalization (Hartelius, Friedman, & Pappas, 2015). However, I think surrendering its title to the even more problematic subdiscipline of spiritual psychology would result in a serious loss of transpersonal psychology’s unique potential to develop as a science devoid of supernatural baggage.…”
Section: Defining Transpersonal Psychologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hartelius and Harrahy (2010) noted that for more than thirty years, transpersonal psychology has placed an emphasis on individual spiritual development, with New Age perennialism as its philosophical foundation. While the field should not be considered a spiritual psychology (Hartelius, Friedman, & Pappas, 2015), human spirituality is clearly a recurrent theme-as well as consideration of ways in which philosophical frames may serve to reaffirm the value of this spirituality as something more than socially constructed imaginings. Ferrer (2002) has provided an extensive critique of the perennialist roots of transpersonal psychology and offered an alternative in the form of participatory thought.…”
Section: Spirituality From Transpersonal Psychologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While it is tempting to eschew metaphysics in our postmodern and poststructuralist milieu, one of the reasons given for the founding of transpersonal psychology was a dissatisfaction with existing “person-centered” psychologies that “ignored placing human beings within a cosmic perspective” (Hartelius, Friedman, & Pappas, 2015, p. 44). Even more significantly, Grof (2015) sharply critiques those scientific approaches that take “leading paradigms for an accurate and definitive description of reality” and whose materialistic explanations of reality cannot account for recent observations in consciousness research.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%