1983
DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0264.1983.tb01008.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Canine Nasal Mucosa

Abstract: Tissues of the nasal mucosa were utilized from 20 dogs, for histochemistry, quantitative measurements and scanning electron microscopy. Attention was given to the type of epithelium, organization of submucosal tissues, distribution of vascular structures and glandular organization. These features are characterized and discussed in regard to the respiratory and immune functions of the nasal mucosa. Introduction Descriptions of the mucous membrane of the canine nasal cavity include that of olfactory epithelium (… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

6
27
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
6
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A five-subsystem scheme emerges if the difference between vomeronasal subsystems based on semiochemical receptor types VR1 and VR2 is taken into account (Barrios et al, 2014). Although numerous studies of the canine nasal mucosa have been published (Lauruschkus, 1942; Müller, 1955; Neuhaus, 1955; Adams and Hotchkiss, 1983; Kavoi et al, 2010), we are unaware of any previous systematic search for these four or five OSbS in the dog. The findings reported above, together with our previous observation that the canine vomeronasal system binds anti-G αi2 but not anti-G αo antibodies (Salazar et al, 2013), show that the dog has only the main and vomeronasal subsystems, and that the latter is in all probability entirely VR1-based.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A five-subsystem scheme emerges if the difference between vomeronasal subsystems based on semiochemical receptor types VR1 and VR2 is taken into account (Barrios et al, 2014). Although numerous studies of the canine nasal mucosa have been published (Lauruschkus, 1942; Müller, 1955; Neuhaus, 1955; Adams and Hotchkiss, 1983; Kavoi et al, 2010), we are unaware of any previous systematic search for these four or five OSbS in the dog. The findings reported above, together with our previous observation that the canine vomeronasal system binds anti-G αi2 but not anti-G αo antibodies (Salazar et al, 2013), show that the dog has only the main and vomeronasal subsystems, and that the latter is in all probability entirely VR1-based.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This assumption is further strengthened by the observation that this CAP flow increase occurred despite the elevation of plasma catecholamines under the condi tions of the experiment, including pentobarbital anesthe sia. The differences between basal local CAP flows in the various tissues confirmed the differences in capillary den sity [21 ]. Our methods are not sensitive enough to demon strate the possible regional variation in AVA flow.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…The relationship between compartments with low and high basal flow rates was generally main tained at different doses of ADP. This may result from the differences in both the density of the various neuroeffec tor connections involved [2] and in CAP density [7]. In addition, the possibility that regions of different blood flow rates differ in sensitivity to ADP cannot be ex cluded.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%