2016
DOI: 10.1002/mana.201600208
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The canonical central exact sequence for locally compact quantum groups

Abstract: Abstract. For a locally compact quantum group G we define its center, Z (G), and its quantum group of inner automorphisms, Inn(G). We show that one obtains a natural isomorphism between Inn(G) and G/Z (G), we characterize normal quantum subgroups of a compact quantum group as those left invariant by the action of the quantum group of inner automorphisms and discuss several examples.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The topics of quantum subgroups are thoroughly covered in [Daw+12] and information on normal quantum subgroups, inner automorphisms etc. can be found in [KSS16] and references therein. We will at some point use the theory of locally compact quantum groups in the sense of Kustermans and Vaes ([KV00]).…”
Section: Notation and Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The topics of quantum subgroups are thoroughly covered in [Daw+12] and information on normal quantum subgroups, inner automorphisms etc. can be found in [KSS16] and references therein. We will at some point use the theory of locally compact quantum groups in the sense of Kustermans and Vaes ([KV00]).…”
Section: Notation and Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…see [17]. In what follows we shall describe the quantum analog of the quotient of G by its commutator subgroup.…”
Section: Lattice Of Closed Quantum Subgroups: Basic Factsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• There are notions of (closed [36,Definition 2.6]) normal [37,Definition 2.10] and central [20,Definition 2.3] quantum subgroups H ≤ G.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The last equality in (2-20) is nothing but (2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14), whereas the first equality will follow once we have (2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21); it thus remains to prove the latter. For that purpose, note that for…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%