1986
DOI: 10.1016/0040-6090(86)90315-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The capacitance of passivated iron electrodes under simulated erosion-corrosion conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The authors justify it by the fact that the particles are brought in the diffusion layer only through particle-particle collisions, that become sufficiently frequent only above the threshold. However, not only this last point is questionable (4)(5)(6)(7), but the experimental results of this model are not satisfactory enough to allow a clear separation of the role of the velocity perturbation from that of the diffusion layer. Such a separation was achieved in the case of fiber suspensions (6) using microelectrodes inserted into an active or inactive RDE.…”
mentioning
confidence: 86%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The authors justify it by the fact that the particles are brought in the diffusion layer only through particle-particle collisions, that become sufficiently frequent only above the threshold. However, not only this last point is questionable (4)(5)(6)(7), but the experimental results of this model are not satisfactory enough to allow a clear separation of the role of the velocity perturbation from that of the diffusion layer. Such a separation was achieved in the case of fiber suspensions (6) using microelectrodes inserted into an active or inactive RDE.…”
mentioning
confidence: 86%
“…D~pp can be given (11) by Cv ] 2/3 Dapp = DM + DM l/a [(9/2)~]1/aa 4/3 (b:/) 2/3 k 1--~-~3j [5] where b is a numerical coefficient lower than 1/2. Taking into account the q value at the wail in the supernatant Dap p can be expressed as follows Dapp = DM(1 + Ar 213) [6] where A is a coefficient equal to…”
Section: W I T H R E S P E C T To Diffusion Prov I D E D T H a T T H ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…39 This shows that the deposition of Sn was monolayer-level, taking into account the roughness factor of 2-3 for a polished steel surface. 40,41 The difference in thickness between polarization potentials of −0.40 and −0.35 V (SSE) implies that the surface coverage of Sn was dependent on the polarization potential. If the Sn species were fully oxidized to SnO 2 by air after polarization to −0.40 and −0.35 V (SSE), the thickness would be equivalent to 1.19 and 0.83 nm, respectively (the density of SnO 2 is 6.95 g cm −3 ), 39 and this is much less than that found using XPS depth analysis.…”
Section: Xps Analysis-figurementioning
confidence: 99%