2004 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (IEEE Cat. No.04TH8733)
DOI: 10.1109/wcnc.2004.1311521
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The capacity of average and peak power constrained fading channels with channel side information

Abstract: Abstract-We derive the ergodic capacity of discrete-time fading channel with additive Gaussian noise subject to both peak and average power constraint. The average power can be interpreted as the cost that we incur to achieve a certain rate. On the other hand, the motivation of this analysis comes from the fact that there is also a peak power limitation in practical communication system. It is been shown that the optimal power adaption is no longer water-filling or constant power adaption which is the case whe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
37
0

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is also noticed that the power allocation scheme given by (12) has the same structure as that in [16], where the ergodic capacity of fading channels is studied under both peak and average transmit power constraints. The main difference is that the power allocation scheme given by (12) is not only related to SU channel but also related to the channel between SU-Tx and PU-Rx.…”
Section: Theoremmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also noticed that the power allocation scheme given by (12) has the same structure as that in [16], where the ergodic capacity of fading channels is studied under both peak and average transmit power constraints. The main difference is that the power allocation scheme given by (12) is not only related to SU channel but also related to the channel between SU-Tx and PU-Rx.…”
Section: Theoremmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As we can see, there is always a small range in which the second region (case 3) occurs. It gets even smaller if we increase the number of antennas n. optimal,n=10 optimal,n=2 sub−optimal,n=10 sub−optimal,n=2 without CSIT,n=10 without CSIT,n=2 Since the capacity versus average SNR for the singleantenna channel has been plotted in [5], we only show the results for MISO systems. For comparison, we have also plotted the capacity for the case in which there is CSI at receiver only (labeled by "Without CSIT").…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The actual received SNR with power adaption is P (γ)γ/P . The authors in [5] have proved a coding theorem that says the ergodic capacity is the solution to the following optimization problem:…”
Section: A the Siso Channelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations