2009
DOI: 10.1109/tit.2009.2019343
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Capacity of Wireless Networks in Nonergodic Random Fading

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We thus assume a narrow-band time-varying channel, whose gain changes to a new independent value for every symbol. Note that this random phase model is based on a far-field assumption [10,11,28], 8 which is valid if the wavelength is sufficiently smaller than the minimum node separation. Based on the above channel characteristics, operating regimes of the network are identified according to the following physical parameters: the absorption a( f ) and the noise PSD N ( f ) which are exploited here by choosing the frequency f based on the number of nodes, n. In other words, if the relationship between f and n is specified, then a( f ) and N ( f ) can be given by a certain scaling function of n from (3) and (5), respectively.…”
Section: System and Channel Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We thus assume a narrow-band time-varying channel, whose gain changes to a new independent value for every symbol. Note that this random phase model is based on a far-field assumption [10,11,28], 8 which is valid if the wavelength is sufficiently smaller than the minimum node separation. Based on the above channel characteristics, operating regimes of the network are identified according to the following physical parameters: the absorption a( f ) and the noise PSD N ( f ) which are exploited here by choosing the frequency f based on the number of nodes, n. In other words, if the relationship between f and n is specified, then a( f ) and N ( f ) can be given by a certain scaling function of n from (3) and (5), respectively.…”
Section: System and Channel Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They showed that the total throughput scales as Θ √ n/ log n when a multi-hop (MH) routing strategy is used for n source-destination (S-D) pairs randomly distributed in a unit area. 1 MH schemes are then further developed and analyzed in [3][4][5][6][7][8][9], while their throughput per S-D pair scales far slower than Θ (1). Recent results [10,11] have shown that an almost linear throughput in the radio network, i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This throughput scaling is achieved using a multihop communication scheme. Multihop schemes were then further developed and analyzed in the literature [2][3][4]. A recent result has shown that we can actually achieve a linear scaling of the total throughput in the network by using a hierarchical cooperation strategy [5] and infrastructure nodes [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effect of fading on the scaling laws was studied in [2,3,7], where it was shown that achievable scaling laws do not fundamentally change if all nodes are assumed to have their own traffic demands, i.e., if heavily loaded network environments are assumed [2,3,7] or the effect of fading is averaged out [2,7]. However, in the literature, there are some results on the usefulness of fading, where one can exploit an opportunistic gain, e.g., opportunistic scheduling [8], opportunistic beam-forming [9], and random beamforming [10] in broadcast channels.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This throughput scaling is achieved using a multi-hop (MH) communication scheme. This was improved to Θ( √ n) by using percolation theory [2], [3]. MH schemes are further developed and analyzed in [4], [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%