The capital structure dynamics of Malaysian firms: timing behavior vs adjustment toward the target

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to investigate how the timing behavior and the adjustment toward the target of capital structure interact with each other in the capital structure decisions. Past literature finds that both timing and targeting are significant in determining the leverage ratio which is inconsistent with any standalone framework. This study argues that the preference of the firm for timing behavior or targeting behavior depends on the cost of deviation from the target. Since the cost of deviation from the target is likely to be asymmetric between overleveraged and underleveraged firms, the direction of the deviation from the target leverage is expected to alter the preference toward timing or targeting in the capital structure decision. Design/methodology/approach This study used the GMM system estimators with the Malaysian data for the period of 1992-2009 to fit a standard partial adjustment model and to estimate the speed of adjustment (SOA) of capital structure. Findings This study finds that Malaysian firms, on average, adjust their leverage at a slow speed of 12.7 percent annually and this rate increased to 14.2 percent when the timing variable is accounted for. Moreover, the SOA is found to be significantly higher and the timing role is lower for overleveraged firms compared with underleveraged firms. Overleveraged firms seem to find less flexibility to time the market as more pressure is exerted on them to return to the target regardless the timing opportunities because of the higher costs of deviation from the target leverage. Underleveraged firms place lower priority to rebalance toward the target compared with overleveraged firms as the costs of being underleveraged are lower and hence, these firms have more flexibility to time the market. Research limitations/implications The findings of this study support that firms consider both targeting and timing in their financing decisions. No standalone theory can interpret the full spectrum of empirical results. The empirical work is based on partial adjustment model of leverage; however, this model has been criticized by inability to distinguish between active adjustment behavior and mechanical mean reversion. This is an avenue for future research. Originality/value This study investigates if targeting and timing behaviors are mutually exclusive as theoretically expected or they can coexist. A theoretical explanation and an empirical investigation support the conclusion that firms consider both targeting and timing in their financing decisions. This study provides evidence from Malaysian firms that are characterized by concentrated ownership structure and separation of cash flow rights and control rights of the firm due to pyramid ownership structure. Therefore, it provides evidence on how environmental characteristics may affect the capital structure determinants of the firm.

Determinants of Capital Structure and Speed of Adjustment: Evidence from Iran and Australia

“…This means that increased profitability in Iranian companies reduces the ratio of total debt and long-term debt ratio. This relationship is consistent with the results of Abul Hadi et al (2016), Kopyakava (2017), Abdeljawad and Mat Nor (2017). The existence of a negative relationship is consistent with the predictions of the Pecking order theory and dynamic trade-off theory.…”

The Effect of Financial Performance and Innovation on Leverage: Evidence from Indonesian Food and Beverage Sector

“…Furthermore, some analyzed the dynamic capital structure by targeting leverage as well as the speed of adjustment (Li, Wu, Xu & Tang, 2017;Abdeljawad & Nor, 2017;Rani, Yadav & Tripathy, 2019). All the results present some novelty and the appropriate variables of leverage.…”

Does Growth Affect Firms’ Leverage Adjustment Speed? A Study of Indian Firms

“…The partial adjustment model has been extensively used in prior capital structure studies in order to examine the capital structure adjustment speed (Banerjee et al, 2000; Byoun, 2008; Chang, Chou, & Huang, 2014; Dang & Garrett, 2015; Dang et al, 2012, 2014; Drobetz & Wanzenried, 2006; Faulkender et al, 2012; Flannery & Rangan, 2006; Flannery Abdeljawad & Nor, 2017; Getzmann, Lang, & Spremann, 2014; Ghose, 2017; Mahakud & Mishra, 2010). Following prior studies, the present study uses the following standard partial adjustment model to investigate firms’ adjustment speed towards their target capital structure 5 5 Byoun (2008) and Dang and Garrett (2015) also used constant in Model-1 to account for changes in observed leverage for reasons other than target adjustment.…”