1996
DOI: 10.1016/s0090-4295(96)00226-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The capsure database: a methodology for clinical practice and research in prostate cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
74
0
1

Year Published

1998
1998
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

5
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 259 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
74
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A detailed description of the rigorous quality control mechanisms and database maintenance techniques in CaPSURE TM is reported elsewhere. 4 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A detailed description of the rigorous quality control mechanisms and database maintenance techniques in CaPSURE TM is reported elsewhere. 4 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To answer these questions we utilized data from CaPSURE TM (Cancer of the Prostate Strategic Urologic Research Endeavor), a large national database of prostate cancer patients followed in a naturalistic setting. 4 Observational databases of this type have been used successfully in the past for the study of a number of other chronic illnesses, including AIDS, 5 rheumatoid arthritis, 6 and coronary artery disease. 7 CaPSURE TM is the ®rst database of its type to study the relationship of clinical and HRQOL information in a cohort of prostate cancer patients.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Completeness and accuracy of the data are assured by random sample chart review every 6 months. 8 A total of 8,685 patients were enrolled in the CaPSURE database between June 1, 1995, when the database was opened, and July 31, 2002. Of this group 2,387 patients were excluded from study because they had unknown or missing risk parameters of PSA at diagnosis (692, 29% of those excluded), biopsy Gleason score (327, 14%) clinical T stage (358, 15%) or multiple parameters (1010, 42%).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All patients provide written informed consent under local and central institutional review board approval [7].…”
Section: Patient Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%