2022
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19042366
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Carbon Emission Assessment of a Building with Different Prefabrication Rates in the Construction Stage

Abstract: The utilization of prefabricated components is taken as a potential way to reduce carbon emissions from the construction industry, and the prefabrication rate may be a factor that influences the mitigation efficiency. This study develops an assessment method to compare carbon emissions of a building in the construction stage when it is built with multiple different prefabrication rates. Firstly, two carbon sources (building materials and machineries) and three construction sub-phases (production of materials a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 10e shows the full-coverage path map for the smoothing operation, where light gray represents reserved holes and dark gray represents protruding embedded components. When passing through the embedded pipe at coordinate (21,4), the BINN algorithm reveals that the activity values of surrounding neurons are less than those at the current location, causing the algorithm to enter a deadlock. By recalculating using the A* algorithm, the deadlock is successfully escaped.…”
Section: (4) Simulation Results and Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 10e shows the full-coverage path map for the smoothing operation, where light gray represents reserved holes and dark gray represents protruding embedded components. When passing through the embedded pipe at coordinate (21,4), the BINN algorithm reveals that the activity values of surrounding neurons are less than those at the current location, causing the algorithm to enter a deadlock. By recalculating using the A* algorithm, the deadlock is successfully escaped.…”
Section: (4) Simulation Results and Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, prefab constructions were proved to consume less energy, produce less wastage, and emit fewer emissions when compared to conventional methods during the construction and end-of-life stages [42,66]. The carbon emissions are further discerned to decrease with the increase in the prefabrication rate [70]. The concept of netzero energy building (nZEB) also includes prefab elements whose ultimate aim is to create an energy-efficient building where net energy flowing to/from a building sums to zero [69].…”
Section: Life Cycle Assessment (Lca)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In prefabrication, building components are manufactured in factories and transported to the construction site for installation. This approach improves construction efficiency and quality, and reduces labour requirements and resource consumption [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16]. Teng et al [17] found that prefabricated buildings achieved an average of 15.6% embodied carbon reduction and 3.2% operational carbon reduction compared to conventional buildings.…”
Section: Introduction 1backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%