“…3,4) Therefore, several studies have suggested the usefulness of FMD measurement in the risk Vol 53 No 3 ENDOTHELIAL FUNCTION AND PROGNOSIS stratification for cardiovascular disease in all stages on the cardiovascular disease continuum. 1,2,4,5) Study aims: The present multicenter prospective study has 1 primary objective: to establish the usefulness of FMD as measured by online semi-automatic software (usually a dedicated device for FMD measurement) in the risk stratification for cardiovascular diseases in Japanese subjects. In addition, there are 4 proposed secondary objectives, as follows: 1) to establish standardized FMD values and the annual rates of FMD change in healthy subjects, and also examine whether the development of the conventional risk factors for cardiovascular disease might modulate the annual rates of FMD change; 2) to assess the predictive value of FMD for future cardiovascular events in Japanese subjects with coronary artery disease (CAD), independent of the conventional risk factors for cardiovascular disease; 6) 3) to evaluate the usefulness of a multimarker strategy, including measurements of FMD, pulse-wave velocity (PWV), 7) ankle-brachial pressure index (ABI), biochemical markers (serum C-reactive protein [CRP], oxidized low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and plasma B-type natriuretic peptide [BNP] levels) 8) and a proteomic biomarker 9) identified by mass-spectroscopic analysis, to assess the prognosis of Japanese subjects with CAD; and 4) to clarify whether FMD might serve as a reliable predictor of the rate of progression of carotid atherosclerosis, 10) arterial stiffness and microalbuminuria in subjects with hypertension or diabetes mellitus, independent of the biochemical and proteomic biomarkers.…”