2014
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2513329
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Career Prospects of Overeducated Americans

Abstract: In this paper we analyze career dynamics for the large share of U.S. workers who have more schooling than their peers in the same occupation. We use data from the NLSY79 combined with the CPS to analyze transitions into and out of overeducated employment, together with the corresponding effects on wages. Overeducation is a fairly persistent phenomenon at the aggregate and individual levels, with 66% of workers remaining overeducated after one year. Overeducation is not only more common, but also more persisten… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Subsequent studies have thrown doubt on this conclusion, however, and longitudinal studies since have generally found a high degree of state dependence (that is, persistence) in being underemployed (e.g. Clark et al (2014) for USA; Diem and Wolter (2014) for a cohort of recent Swiss graduates; Kiersztyn (2013) for Poland; Mavromaras et al (2013) for Australia). It seems that being obliged to accept a lower-status job to end unemployment at the start of the career slows down the transition into an education-adequate job compared to a longer initial search period (Baert et al, 2013).…”
Section: (I) Why Underemployment Is a Useful Analytical Conceptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsequent studies have thrown doubt on this conclusion, however, and longitudinal studies since have generally found a high degree of state dependence (that is, persistence) in being underemployed (e.g. Clark et al (2014) for USA; Diem and Wolter (2014) for a cohort of recent Swiss graduates; Kiersztyn (2013) for Poland; Mavromaras et al (2013) for Australia). It seems that being obliged to accept a lower-status job to end unemployment at the start of the career slows down the transition into an education-adequate job compared to a longer initial search period (Baert et al, 2013).…”
Section: (I) Why Underemployment Is a Useful Analytical Conceptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a 20-year-old young person, to be unemployed for 1 year is to have lost 5% of one's life to date in unemployment; to be unemployed for 2 years is to have lost 10% of one's life in unemployment! Added to that is the problem of scarring: one spell of unemployment is likely to lead to repeat spells (Junankar and Wood, 1992) and to lower life-time earnings (Clark et al, 2014). Is it surprising that the long-term unemployed suffer from alienation, psychological problems and depression?…”
Section: The Youth Labour Market After the Gfcmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The prospects facing a large and growing number of young people are therefore grim. Recent research (Clark et al, 2014;Mavromaras et al, 2013;Stewart, 2007) suggests a long-term scarring effect of taking on a job that is below the skill level of the person who does so: the probability of subsequently getting a good job (i.e. one that is appropriate for that person's skills and education levels) is decreased significantly.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, the signs and sizes are roughly equivalent to similar OLS cross‐section estimates of 1979 NLSY cohort data in Clark et al . (2017). Another consistency with the literature is the reduction in the coefficient on required education by more than half once unobserved heterogeneity is controlled for in Models 2, 4, and 5.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2014) and Clark et al . (2017), that can be expressed in its simplest form when using panel data as: yit=αedRit+βedOit+δedUit+ziboldθ+xitϑ+τt+εit, where y it is the natural log of the wage (wage +1) of individual i in year t ; z i is a vector consisting of time invariant controls; x it is a vector of time variant controls; α , β , δ , θ , and ϑ are estimable coefficients; τ t are time dummies and ε it denotes the error term 6…”
Section: Empirical Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%