2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0006-291x(03)00634-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The cargo receptor ERGIC-53 is a target of the unfolded protein response

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
20
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
2
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The evidence presented in this paper shows that both expression level and recycling pathway of the protein are modulated by heat shock. While this work was in progress, it was shown that ERGIC-53 is transcriptionally activated during UPR (24). Our results confirm this observation and, interestingly, show that the accumulation of ERGIC-53 during heat shock is driven only by enhanced translation of its mRNA.…”
supporting
confidence: 88%
“…The evidence presented in this paper shows that both expression level and recycling pathway of the protein are modulated by heat shock. While this work was in progress, it was shown that ERGIC-53 is transcriptionally activated during UPR (24). Our results confirm this observation and, interestingly, show that the accumulation of ERGIC-53 during heat shock is driven only by enhanced translation of its mRNA.…”
supporting
confidence: 88%
“…A relationship between the ER exit and the UPR, namely through the modulation of cargo proteins' levels, has already been described, suggesting that this stress response affects protein traffic from and beyond the ER (36,37). The finding that the time spent by MHC-I complexes in the ER determines the extent of the peptide-loading optimization (38) suggests that its reduced cell surface expression in HFE C282Y mutant cells is the outcome of an incomplete peptide optimization due to the premature ER release in UPR active cells.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Therefore, we tested whether Ca V 2.2 current suppression by Ca V ␥ 2 involved activation of the UPR. Initially, we investigated the effects of genistein, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor that prevents full expression of the UPR through inactivation of the transcription factor NF-Y (nuclear factor Y) (Zhou and Lee, 1998;Nyfeler et al, 2003). After 6 h treatment with the drug (140 M), there was no significant change in I Ba density of Ca V ␥ 2 -expressing cells (Fig.…”
Section: N-linked Protein Glycosylation Is Not a Major Determinant Formentioning
confidence: 99%