1991
DOI: 10.5186/aasfm.1991.1619
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Carleson measure and meromorphic functions of uniformly bounded characteristic

Abstract: Abstract. For a meromorphic function /(z) defined in the unit disc D : lzl < 1 on the complex z-plane, z = x * iy, we denote its spherical derivative bv f#(r) and introduce the differentiable form dpyQ) = (1 -lzl2)lf+(z)l2dxdy. We prove that f(z) has the uniformly bounded characteristic if and only if the measur" WQ) is the Carleson measure. This result answers a question posed by S. Yamashita in Internat.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This completes the proof of (ii), as f 1 / f 2 is a normal function in the Nevanlinna class if and only if the right-hand side of (27) is finite [38,Theorem 1].…”
Section: Proofs Of Theorem 6 and Propositionmentioning
confidence: 65%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This completes the proof of (ii), as f 1 / f 2 is a normal function in the Nevanlinna class if and only if the right-hand side of (27) is finite [38,Theorem 1].…”
Section: Proofs Of Theorem 6 and Propositionmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…A meromorphic function w is said to be of uniformly bounded characteristic, that is w ∈ UBC, if w # (z) 2 (1 − |z| 2 ) dm(z) is a Carleson measure. We refer to [38,Theorem 3] for more details.…”
Section: Blaschke-oscillatory Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This completes the proof of (ii), as f 1 /f 2 is a normal function in the Nevanlinna class if and only if the right-hand side of ( 27) is finite [36,Theorem 1].…”
Section: Proofs Of Theorem 6 and Propositionmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…then e −Λ̺ω(z From this estimate we deduce (36). Assume that (36) holds for some constant 0 < Λ < ∞. Fix z 2 ∈ D. Since lim…”
Section: Proofs Of Theorem 13 and Corollary 15mentioning
confidence: 87%
“…This corrects Proposition 2 (i) in [4] where "equality" between Q # p and M # p was "proved". The proof of Proposition 2 (i) was based on [9,Corollary]. The following theorem shows very strongly that some results for the spaces of analytic functions do not remain true for the corresponding classes of meromorphic functions.…”
Section: −āZmentioning
confidence: 99%