Diamonds from the Machado River alluvial deposit have been characterised on the basis of external morphology, internal textures, carbon isotopic composition, nitrogen concentration and aggregation state and mineral inclusion chemistry. Variations in morphology and features of abrasion suggest some diamonds have been derived directly from local kimberlites, whereas others have been through extensive sedimentary recycling. On the basis of mineral inclusion compositions, both lithospheric and sublithospheric diamonds are present at the deposit. The lithospheric diamonds have clear layer-by-layer octahedral and/or cuboid internal growth zonation, contain measurable nitrogen and indicate a heterogeneous lithospheric mantle beneath the region. The sublithospheric diamonds show a lack of regular sharp zonation, do not contain detectable nitrogen, are isotopically heavy (δ 13 CPDB predominantly-0.7-5.5) and contain inclusions of ferropericlase, former bridgmanite, majoritic garnet and former CaSiO3-perovskite. This suggests source lithologies that are Mg-and Ca-rich, probably including carbonates and serpentinites, subducted to lower mantle depths. The studied suite of sublithospheric diamonds has many similarities to the alluvial diamonds from Kankan, Guinea, but has more extreme variations in mineral inclusion chemistry. Of all superdeep diamond suites yet discovered, Machado River represents an end-member in terms of either the compositional range of materials being subducted to Transition Zone and lower mantle or the process by which materials are transferred from the subducted slab to the diamond-forming region. Keywords bridgmanite; majorite; subduction; carbon; superdeep; diamond 1. Introduction Although the vast majority of the world's diamonds are characterised by being inclusion-free (96-99 %), and ~ 28 % of inclusions are trace-element poor olivines and chrome spinels (Stachel and Harris, 2008), they have continued to draw keen interest from petrologists and geochemists. While diamonds undoubtedly offer a selective view of the deep Earth, in particular of the highly depleted Archaean cratonic mantle (Stachel and Harris, 2008), the fidelity with which the chemistry of inclusions is preserved makes them a valuable scientific resource. Around 5-10 % of diamonds are derived from beneath the base of the lithosphere (i.e. sublithospheric, or "superdeep") and are direct evidence of the mixing and recycling processes that lead to mantlederived lavas with diverse isotopic and elemental characteristics (e.g. Pietruszka et al., 2013). The minerals that are included in these superdeep diamonds may only represent a single fragment of a single geological event in a rock's life cycle, but this information is essential for reconstructing the geological history of subducted material. Variations in the characteristics of diamonds and their inclusions within and between localities testify about the spatial and/or temporal variability of the source region: they reveal, for example, the presence of multiple