1952
DOI: 10.1007/bf02879189
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The case against mineral oil

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1958
1958
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Mineral oils might also impair the absorption of warfarin and lessen the effect of the anticoagulant 7,16,17 .…”
Section: Drugs Affecting Availability Of Vitamin Kmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mineral oils might also impair the absorption of warfarin and lessen the effect of the anticoagulant 7,16,17 .…”
Section: Drugs Affecting Availability Of Vitamin Kmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prior to the advent of the fecal softening agents, mineral oil was commonly used as a lubricant to prevent impaction. However, there is ample evidence that mineral oil is not a harmless substance, as was once believed (3). Mineral oil interferes with the absorption of the fat‐soluble vitamins, interferes with digestion, gestion, may contain carcinogens, and as much as 60 per cent may be absorbed from the intestine.…”
Section: The Problemmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…More serious disadvantages are interference with digestion and absorption by coating the food particles and the intestinal mucosa (Donald 1959); in extreme cases considerable loss of weight has been described. The system may be depleted of fat soluble vitamins, especially A and to a lesser extent D and E, and there is some danger that hypothrombinaemia may result from preventing absorption of vitamin K — a serious consequence to pregnant women and to those undergoing surgical operations (Becker 1952; Black 1953).…”
Section: The Use Of Laxativesmentioning
confidence: 99%