2012
DOI: 10.1080/1072303x.2012.683519
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Case for a 60-Day Interlibrary Loan Lending Period

Abstract: This article looks at standardizing the loan period among 16 higher academic institutions in the state of Florida. A standardized loan period became a topic of conversation during the creation of a new resource sharing service. The resulting discussion led to a critical look at loan periods for all resource sharing activities.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 6 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The lending library would determine whether or not to approve the request and send their response, which would then be transmitted back to the patron. This excess of processing, spurred discussion in the group on whether to extend the standard loan period from 30 to 60 days (Shrauger, Radnor, & Schmidt, 2012). A longer loan period would result in fewer renewal requests made by patrons and thus less work.…”
Section: Outcomes the First Yearmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lending library would determine whether or not to approve the request and send their response, which would then be transmitted back to the patron. This excess of processing, spurred discussion in the group on whether to extend the standard loan period from 30 to 60 days (Shrauger, Radnor, & Schmidt, 2012). A longer loan period would result in fewer renewal requests made by patrons and thus less work.…”
Section: Outcomes the First Yearmentioning
confidence: 99%