2013
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2012.1994
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The case for a dorsal V3 in the ‘third-tier’ of primate visual cortex: a reply to ‘the case for a dorsomedial area in the primate ‘third-tier’ visual cortex’

Abstract: Invited replyCite this article: Lyon DC. 201 The case for a dorsal V3 in the 'third-tier' of primate visual cortex: a reply to 'the case for a dorsomedial area in the primate 'third-tier' visual cortex'.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The difficulty in obtaining such evidence highlights, in our view, the main weakness of the pinched-V3 model: it fitted the expectation that a continuous area V3 exists, based on the history of investigation of the third tier visual cortex in macaques, at the time when the results were reported; however, it was not based on strong experimental evidence that disproved competing models. Instead, as discussed elsewhere (Rosa et al, 2005 ), we regard this model, and more in general any idea of a pinched V3 (Lyon, 2013 ), as not parsimonious in light of other lines of evidence. Nevertheless, based on the present review and that by Kaas and colleagues in this same special issue, it is clear that, while the simple V3-only model is dead, current data cannot refute two of the competing models, the “pinched-V3” and the “multiple-areas” model.…”
Section: Remaining Issues and Future Studiesmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The difficulty in obtaining such evidence highlights, in our view, the main weakness of the pinched-V3 model: it fitted the expectation that a continuous area V3 exists, based on the history of investigation of the third tier visual cortex in macaques, at the time when the results were reported; however, it was not based on strong experimental evidence that disproved competing models. Instead, as discussed elsewhere (Rosa et al, 2005 ), we regard this model, and more in general any idea of a pinched V3 (Lyon, 2013 ), as not parsimonious in light of other lines of evidence. Nevertheless, based on the present review and that by Kaas and colleagues in this same special issue, it is clear that, while the simple V3-only model is dead, current data cannot refute two of the competing models, the “pinched-V3” and the “multiple-areas” model.…”
Section: Remaining Issues and Future Studiesmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…This complexity in topographic organization has been deemed a “possible aberration from microelectrode mapping” (Lyon, 2013 ), since it was not found in experiments using intrinsic signal imaging in owl monkeys (Lyon et al, 2002 ). However, we argue that single-unit mapping offers a higher resolution view of the topographic organization of the cortex, by providing direct evidence of the locations of receptive fields, and their changes over small distances.…”
Section: Receptive Field Mapping In the New World Monkey Third Tier Cmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations