2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0272-6386(01)80127-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The case for dialy dialysis: Its impact on costs and quality of life

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

5
124
0
3

Year Published

2004
2004
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 131 publications
(132 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
5
124
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…It seems obvious that widespread implementation of the WAK as the standard for renal replacement therapy would result in vast savings in labor and costs of operating a dialysis unit. This savings would be incremental on the savings in drug use and hospitalizations brought about already with daily dialysis (6). We are painfully aware that our efforts to build a WAK would be useless if the implementation of its use in practice is not affordable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It seems obvious that widespread implementation of the WAK as the standard for renal replacement therapy would result in vast savings in labor and costs of operating a dialysis unit. This savings would be incremental on the savings in drug use and hospitalizations brought about already with daily dialysis (6). We are painfully aware that our efforts to build a WAK would be useless if the implementation of its use in practice is not affordable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Growing evidence indicates that longer and more frequent dialysis may be conducive to biochemical as well as clinical improvements. However, implementation of daily dialysis is largely impractical (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7). The development of a wearable artificial kidney (WAK) that would allow for longer and more frequent dialysis has been ongoing for decades, but has resulted in failure due almost entirely to insurmountable technical problems (8,9).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An association between individual patients' use of more frequent HD and increased likelihood of employment has been suggested in reports of data from several small patient cohorts (12). Based on a multicenter study of 72 patients who used frequent HD from 1972 to 1996, Woods et al reported that the most common reason given for patients starting frequent HD was lifestyle or employment (24).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2004, the survey began to collect aggregate information on the number of patients aged 18 to 54 in the facility and the number of patients aged 18 to 54 who were employed at the end of the calendar year, in addition to counts of patients entering and leaving the facility and counts of patients in specific treatment modality categories at the end of the survey period. The survey also annually captures several facility characteristics that are recognized as potentially relevant for patient employment, i.e., availability of a late dialysis shift (10), availability of home dialysis treatment options (11), provision of frequent hemodialysis (HD) treatment (12), and level of social worker staffing (13).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although there is considerable variability in analytic approaches and their results, it is generally accepted that home hemodialysis is associated with fewer human resources and lower facility management expenses. [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14] However, when patients self-dialyze at home, some expenses (such as the utility costs of running the dialysis equipment) are transferred to the patient. The aim of this study was to measure utility consumption (water and electricity) required to perform various prescriptions of home hemodialysis, and estimate the associated costs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%