The case for increased centralization in integration governance: the neglected perspective

Abstract

Local autonomy is a highly promoted feature in European governance, and the integration field is no exception. In the integration literature, values and considerations favoring local autonomy are often emphasized, while values and considerations underpinning central steering has received less analytical attention, thus a more nuanced perspective in studies of central–local governance relations is warranted. This commentary identifies general dilemmas in central–local governance which expose clear justifications for both local autonomy and central steering. Furthermore, it presents empirical examples of policy changes regulating central–local governance in the Scandinavian countries where increased centralization has been introduced with reference to promoting values and considerations favoring central steering, such as a fairer distribution of responsibilities between local authorities, legal safeguards for individuals, and equal service provision across the country. Lastly, it suggests how future studies of central–local governance could benefit from of taking a more nuanced perspective.

Towards a Regionally Responsive Network implementation challenges in New Zealand’s reforms to vocational education

“…The relative merits of centralisation and decentralisation in public service delivery is a perennial policy debate, with a surprisingly sparse and contradictory evidence base (Brothaler and Getzner, 2010;Mok, 2004;Ryan and Woods, 2015). Both approaches have prima facie benefits: centralisation is often regarded as a means to achieve efficiencies via economies of scale (Acemoglu et al, 2016;Hernes, 2021), although criticisms are often articulated in respect of (over) centralised 'one-size-fitsall' systems as not being able to meet local aspirations and need (Duranton, 2018). Arguably, decentralised 'place-based' decision making more appropriately addresses local needs (Brownie et al, 2023;Duranton, 2018;Kline, 2010), enabling those with better knowledge of users and the community to make timely and appropriate decisions (Brady, 2002).…”

Efficiency and Challenges in Public Real Estate Management: Insights From Lithuania

“…However, it is generally agreed upon that the most favorable public real estate management model in terms of efficiency is the centralized model. Centralized approach in PREM allows for the consolidation of resources, standardization of practices, effective risk management and specialized knowledge (Hernes, 2021).…”