“…This process was guided by: (1) the procedures adopted in other recent critical reviews within sport psychology (e.g., Holt & Tamminen, 2010;Rumbold, Fletcher, & Daniels, 2012); (2) reviews suggesting the integration of new methods into sport psychology from other domains (e.g., Cross, Acquah, & Ramsey, 2014); and (3) previous reviews of SST literature (e.g., Campbell, 2012;Hymmen et al, 2013). Our review will adopt a similar approach in terms of summarizing interventiontype papers; however, given that one of the aims is to provide the reader with an insight into the characteristics and common features of SST that distinguish this way of working from other traditional methods, our review also considers descriptive papers (i.e., overviews, case studies, reflective papers).…”