2011 IEEE Consumer Communications and Networking Conference (CCNC) 2011
DOI: 10.1109/ccnc.2011.5766456
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The case for using traffic forecasting in schedule-based channel access

Abstract: In this paper, we explore the idea of using traffic forecasting to improve the delay performance of a schedulebased medium access control protocol. Schedule-based channel access has been shown to utilize network and energy resources efficiently but is often hindered by the extra delay that scheduling introduces. We explore the use of traffic forecasting to anticipate transmission schedules instead of establishing them reactively, thereby reducing scheduling delays. We show the potential performance benefits tr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, note that since the MAC-layer slots impose a discrete structure, the corresponding random variable in our case has a geometric distribution whose parameter is calculated based on the λ of the underlying exponential random variable. 33 Recall that for massive IoT, the delay constraint of burst j, which relates to the IoT application, is typically less than or equal to the traffic generation interval T i of the device i that generates burst j. Hence, new bursts typically do not accumulate at device i as i attempts to send the current burst by repeating this procedure until d j .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, note that since the MAC-layer slots impose a discrete structure, the corresponding random variable in our case has a geometric distribution whose parameter is calculated based on the λ of the underlying exponential random variable. 33 Recall that for massive IoT, the delay constraint of burst j, which relates to the IoT application, is typically less than or equal to the traffic generation interval T i of the device i that generates burst j. Hence, new bursts typically do not accumulate at device i as i attempts to send the current burst by repeating this procedure until d j .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main differences between these articles and JFS are as follows: (1) While these articles have addressed only Human-to-Human (H2H) applications, we focus entirely on M2M traffic for IoT in this paper. (2) Our methodology differs significantly from [32] and [33] in that we develop deterministic scheduling techniques while they use probabilistic scheduling. (3) While these papers focus on application-layer flows without any physical layer modeling, our emphasis is on the MAC-layer scheduling in the presence of multiple channels at the physical layer (as in OFDMA systems).…”
Section: Relationship To the State Of The Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other work [31,45,48] has developed proactive access schemes for Machineto-Human (M2H) or Human-to-Machine (H2M) traffic, while earlier research [43,44] has focused on Human-to-Human (H2H) traffic. In [43] a schedule-based protocol an expert system is used to determine schedules that minimize delay and maximize channel utilization.…”
Section: Proactive Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other work [31,45,48] has developed proactive access schemes for Machineto-Human (M2H) or Human-to-Machine (H2M) traffic, while earlier research [43,44] has focused on Human-to-Human (H2H) traffic. In [43] a schedule-based protocol an expert system is used to determine schedules that minimize delay and maximize channel utilization. In [44], forecasts of data rates of individual applications are used to schedule channel scheduling, and network load has also been balanced based on the forecast of the total load of all machine-type devices [31].…”
Section: Proactive Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%