The Casey Allied Health Model of Interdisciplinary Care (CAHMIC): Development and implementation

Jacob, Angela; Merrigan, Rosemary; Roe, Debbie; Brown, Thomas W.

doi:10.12968/ijtr.2013.20.8.387

Cited by 9 publications

(13 citation statements)

References 9 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…[15] Interdisciplinary collaboration depends on positive interpersonal skills that can lead to the development of a healthy work environment in the process of providing high-quality care. [16] Giving nurses an opportunity to improve their interpersonal skills may help in improving decision-making in the shared governance process.…”

Section: Interpersonal Skillsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Motivation can result from the individual or the organization. [5,16,17,19,20,33] Intrinsic motivation results in the individual member of the interdisciplinary team always willing to volunteer to work in the context of SG. Organizational leaders and managers can provide a reward to effective team members which will in turn motivate them towards working collaboratively to improve the outcomes of the team.…”

Section: Motivationmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Motivation among interdisciplinary teams can be demonstrated by the willingness of the team members to prioritize shared goals over personal interests. [5,8,16,17,19] Members of an interdisciplinary team will show different levels of commitment depending on their levels of motivation. [19] Stereotypes and perspectives nurtured in different disciplines may influence individual motivation and hence impact their motivation towards the team.…”

Section: Motivationmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Interdisciplinary shared governance: A literature review

Alrwaihi

Kehyayan²,

Johnson³

2017

JNEP

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: Interdisciplinary shared governance (IDSG) is important in healthcare to achieve quality and excellence in patient care. Initially adopted in healthcare facilities for the nursing discipline, the recent trend is to expand it to include other disciplines. This paper examined the factors that affect interdisciplinary collaboration that effect successful implementation of an IDSG model. Methods: A literature review on SG, interdisciplinary collaboration, and factors that may potentially influence its successful implementation was conducted. Results: The review of the literature identified several factors grouped under three major themes that affect IDSG. The first theme was individual factors that include the subthemes provider attitude, beliefs, interpersonal skills, and status quo. The second theme was shared factors that includes both individual as well as organizational factors. They include physician-nurse relationships, clear goals and vision, motivation, trust and respect, and team functional skills. Finally, the organizational factors refer to those that impact the working environment and influence decision making by members of the various interdisciplinary teams. These factors include organizational structure, organizational culture, leadership, education, resources, professional boundary, and role ambiguity. Conclusions: The IDSG requires that groups in different disciplines make informed decisions pertaining their work environment as well as those towards patient's care.

show abstract

Section: Interpersonal Skillsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Motivationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Motivationmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Interdisciplinary shared governance: A literature review

Alrwaihi

Kehyayan²,

Johnson³

2017

JNEP

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Sylvia et al, 2011), interdisciplinary (e.g. Jacob et al, 2013;Sibbald et al, 2013), holism (Kim 2000), etc have been dominating the academic, institutional and individual professional activities. It is believed that complex and persistent health and social problems can be more effectively addressed by integrating research expertise and scholarship from diverse range of disciplines (Clarke, Hawkins, Sadler et al, 2012).…”

Section: The Transformation Of Health Care System Todaymentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Thus, enables the institution to develop and provide a complete health care that allows satisfaction of the complex human needs that is conditioned by space, time and scope reality. The interdisciplinary team coordinates and functions through given institutional structures, and the team problem-solving ability is greater than that which could be achieved by a single individual´s profession-specific knowledge base (Ruddy & Rhee 2005in Jacob et al, 2013. For instance, Taylor (2008) asserts that correction of malnutrition has shown to have effects on wound healing, on length of hospital confinement, morbidity, and mortality.…”

Section: Institutional Levelmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Critical Theoretical Perspectives and the Health Care System

Princeton¹

2015

RAH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background of the study: The goal of healthcare system is to achieve a well-organized, safe and holistic patient care. However, the existing healthcare system of today remains fragmented and complex (St. Meld. Nr.47, 2008. Hence, it is still unable to meet the patients´ complete integrated health care needs; and at the same time patients often experience extraneous disappointments due to unnecessary delays, disputes and complications (St. Meld. Nr.47, 2008. Aim: The aim of this literature study is to show how critical theoretical perspectives influence the healthcare system through professional practitioners, institutional strategies and research methodology and/or policy; in order to meet the complete needs of the patients and guarantee health care services of quality and safety. Result: Health care is a set of complex phenomena that involves a vast of objective theoretical and scientific knowledge; professional's subjective ability to properly apply such knowledge; and a system of interaction that can ensure a well-coordinated, sufficient, efficient and safe health care service. There are three emerging levels of developing culture in health care that are addressing the health care needs of human beings today: 1 Professional level (provision of critical health care through professional´s subjective synthesis of knowledge; 2 Institutional level (provision of critical institutional multidisciplinary health care through facilitated socially construed team coordination); 3 Academic level (provision of critical academic health care through interdisciplinary research generating objective knowledge with ideological policies and approach). Conclusion: Critical theory embraces the scientific traditions that advocate proper objectivity and subjectivity in a manner that social construction of health care becomes more appropriate, effective, and complete. Critical perspectives in health care transform the system into an integrative multidisciplinary model that provide a more thorough patient care, which brings about emancipating social changes at the three levels of health care system. Critical competencies facilitate holistic-oriented, trustworthy and safeguarding individual professional independent practice, regulatory institutions and ideological academy.

show abstract

Realist evaluation of allied health management in Queensland: what works, in which contexts and why

Mickan¹,

Dawber

Hulcombe

2019

Aust. Health Review

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Allied health structures and leadership positions vary throughout Australia and New Zealand in their design and implementation. It is not clear which organisational factors support allied health leaders and professionals to enhance clinical outcomes. The aim of this project was to identify key organisational contexts and corresponding mechanisms that influenced effective outcomes for allied health professionals. A qualitative realist evaluation was chosen to describe key aspects of allied health organisational structures, identify positive outcomes and describe how context and processes are operationalised to influence outcomes for the allied health workforce and the populations they serve. A purposive sample of nine allied health leaders, five executives and 49 allied health professionals were interviewed individually and in focus groups, representing nine Queensland Health services. Marked differences exist in the title and focus of senior allied health leaders' roles. The use of a qualitative realist evaluation methodology enabled identification of the mechanisms that work to achieve effective and efficient outcomes, within specific contexts. The initial middle range theory of allied health organisational structures in Queensland was supported and extended to better understand which contexts were important and which key mechanisms were activated to achieve effective outcomes. Executive allied health leadership roles enable allied health leaders to use their influence in organisational planning and decision-making to ensure allied health professionals deliver successful patient care services. Professional governance systems embed the management and support of the clinical workforce most efficiently within professional disciplines. With consistent data management systems, allied health professional staff can be integrated within clinical teams that provide high-quality care. Interprofessional learning opportunities can enhance collaborative teamwork and, when allied health professionals are supported to understand and use research, they can deliver positive patient and business outcomes for the health service. A collective allied health organisational structure encourages engagement of allied health professionals within healthcare organisations. Organisational structures commonly include management and leadership strategies and service delivery models. Allied health leaders in Queensland work across a range of senior management levels to ensure adequate resources for sufficient suitably skilled professional staff to meet patient needs. Literature to date has described how allied health professionals operate within organisational structures. This paper examines key aspects of allied health management, governance and leadership, together with mechanisms that support allied health professionals to deliver effective clinical and business outcomes for their local community. Health service executives and allied health leaders should consider supporting executive allied health leadership roles to influence strategic pl...

show abstract

The Casey Allied Health Model of Interdisciplinary Care (CAHMIC): Development and implementation

Cited by 9 publications

References 9 publications

Interdisciplinary shared governance: A literature review

Interdisciplinary shared governance: A literature review

The Critical Theoretical Perspectives and the Health Care System

Realist evaluation of allied health management in Queensland: what works, in which contexts and why

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About