Here, the choice of the first coordination
shell of the metal center
is analyzed from the perspective of charge maintenance in a binary
enzyme–substrate complex and an O2-bound ternary
complex in the nonheme iron oxygenases. Comparing homogentisate 1,2-dioxygenase
and gentisate dioxygenase highlights the significance of charge maintenance
after substrate binding as an important factor that drives the reaction
coordinate. We then extend the charge analysis to several common types
of nonheme iron oxygenases containing either a 2-His-1-carboxylate
facial triad or a 3-His or 4-His ligand motif, including extradiol
and intradiol ring-cleavage dioxygenases, thiol dioxygenases, α-ketoglutarate-dependent
oxygenases, and carotenoid cleavage oxygenases. After forming the
productive enzyme–substrate complex, the overall charge of
the iron complex at the 0, +1, or +2 state is maintained in the remaining
catalytic steps. Hence, maintaining a constant charge is crucial to
promote the reaction of the iron center beginning from the formation
of the Michaelis or ternary complex. The charge compensation to the
iron ion is tuned not only by protein-derived carboxylate ligands
but also by substrates. Overall, these analyses indicate that charge
maintenance at the iron center is significant when all the necessary
components form a productive complex. This charge maintenance concept
may apply to most oxygen-activating metalloenzymes systems that do
not draw electrons and protons step-by-step from a separate reactant,
such as NADH, via a reductase. The charge maintenance perception may
also be useful in proposing catalytic pathways or designing prototypical
reactions using artificial or engineered enzymes for biotechnological
applications.