2021
DOI: 10.3390/w13223254
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Catastrophe of the Niedów Dam—The Causes of the Dam’s Breach, Its Development, and Consequences

Abstract: Due to extreme rainfall in 2010 in the Lusatian Neisse River catchment area (in Poland), a flood event with a return period of over 100 years occurred, leading to the failure of the Niedów dam. The earth-type dam constructed for cooling the Turów power plant was washed away, resulting in the rapid release of nearly 8.5 million m3 of water and the flooding of the downstream area with substantial material losses. Here we analyze the conditions and causes of the dam’s failure, with special attention given to the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the present study, we applied the MIKE 21 two-dimensional hydrodynamic module. MIKE [53] is considered one of the most commonly used software tools for dam failure simulation [18,27,28,54], whereas the methodology developed by GRS [47], which was selected to evaluate the uncertainty of flood wave modeling results and sensitivity of hydrodynamic model parameters, is not mentioned as a usual tool in hydrological studies [55]. Initially, it was created for technical systems [47,56] and is currently considered one of the most used methods in the nuclear field [57].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the present study, we applied the MIKE 21 two-dimensional hydrodynamic module. MIKE [53] is considered one of the most commonly used software tools for dam failure simulation [18,27,28,54], whereas the methodology developed by GRS [47], which was selected to evaluate the uncertainty of flood wave modeling results and sensitivity of hydrodynamic model parameters, is not mentioned as a usual tool in hydrological studies [55]. Initially, it was created for technical systems [47,56] and is currently considered one of the most used methods in the nuclear field [57].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As already mentioned, we could not find similar studies to compare our findings. The studies devoted to the modeling of conventional single dams' failures emphasize the significance of the correct estimation of outflow hydrograph, its volume, and peak flow, which depend on breach geometry, the development of the dam break, the height of the dam, the reservoir length, storage volume and other parameters [18,60,61]. Like in our study, in the case of dam series, the accurate prediction of the wave propagation in the downstream reservoirs is of critical importance [35].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As the overflow commenced, the flow began to spread across the river floodplain, with the depth of the river varying along its course, influenced by the outlet flow rate and the slope of the river in each location. In the literature, we found a similar method to take into account the initial river condition [28].…”
Section: Presence Of River Flow Downstream Of the Breakmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The flood wave would change its parameters (width, height, and discharge) because of the geometry of the area downstream of the dam. In order to perform the unsteady flow analysis with the failure scenario [48,49], six steps were followed: (a) the geometry model was created in HEC-RAS 5.0. 7 using RAS Mapper, (b) dam characteristics were entered in order to create the dam, (c) failure parameters were calculated, (d) roughness data were entered, (e) the influx data were defined, and (f) the computation time was calculated [43,50].…”
Section: Dam Break Scenariomentioning
confidence: 99%