Encyclopedia of Special Education 2008
DOI: 10.1002/9780470373699.speced0381
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Cattell‐Horn‐Carroll Theory of Cognitive Abilities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
144
0
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(157 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
10
144
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In studies on the intelligence-creativity relationship, intelligence is usually assessed with standardized tests. These differ in the specific cognitive abilities covered; however, classified in the most recent structural model of cognitive abilities (i.e., the Cattell-Horn-Carroll [CHC] model; Schneider & McGrew, 2018), the majority of tests assess general intelligence and the same six broader abilities (Caemmerer et al, 2020). For creativity, measurements are more heterogeneous and involve different cognitive and noncognitive components (Plucker & Makel, 2010).…”
Section: Construct Operationalizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In studies on the intelligence-creativity relationship, intelligence is usually assessed with standardized tests. These differ in the specific cognitive abilities covered; however, classified in the most recent structural model of cognitive abilities (i.e., the Cattell-Horn-Carroll [CHC] model; Schneider & McGrew, 2018), the majority of tests assess general intelligence and the same six broader abilities (Caemmerer et al, 2020). For creativity, measurements are more heterogeneous and involve different cognitive and noncognitive components (Plucker & Makel, 2010).…”
Section: Construct Operationalizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and find a solution to a new problem) and inductive reasoning (discover underlying rules etc.) (Flanagan, 2008). Interestingly, fluid intelligence has been repeatedly found to have a positive correlation with cognitive reflection (Corgnet et al, 2016;Missier et al, 2012;Primi et al, 2016;Sobkow et al, 2020).…”
Section: Associations Of Fake and True News Classification With Intelligencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In line with this, it is oftentimes operationalized by means of tests on (cultural specific) declarative knowledge (Flanagan, 2008;Schipolowski et al, 2014;Steger et al, 2019). Given this definition and operationalization, it is reasonable to assume that individuals scoring high in crystallized intelligence might be less likely to believe fake news and to disbelieve true news.…”
Section: Associations Of Fake and True News Classification With Intelligencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CHCToCA is a model that is supported by developmental, neurocognitive and outcome-criterion literature (Flanagan, 2013). In the CHCToCA model, cognitive abilities are categorized as either broad or narrow abilities (Flanagan, 2013). There are two types of broad cognitive abilities: domain-specific and domain-free (Flanagan & Harrison, 2012).…”
Section: Description Of the Test Of Visual Perceptual Skills-4 (Tvps-4)mentioning
confidence: 99%