2019
DOI: 10.3386/w25419
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Causal Impact of Removing Children from Abusive and Neglectful Homes

Abstract: This paper measures impacts of removing children from families investigated for abuse or neglect. We use removal tendencies of child protection investigators as an instrument. We focus on young children investigated before age 6 and find that removal significantly increases test scores and reduces grade repetition for girls. There are no detectable impacts for boys. This pattern of results does not appear to be driven by heterogeneity in pre-removal characteristics, foster placements, or the type of schools at… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using a similar approach an earlier study by Doyle found an association between placement and increased risk of pregnancy for girls. Bald et al (2019) found no significant effect for pregnancy and Font and Colleagues (2019) found a protective effect against early adolescent pregnancy. Finally, using Waves 1 and 3 of NSCAW I data -Orsi, Brown, Knight, and Shillington (2018) compared children ages 6-12 receiving in-home services to children not served on various developmental and sociobehavioral measures.…”
Section: Health and Behavioral Healthmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Using a similar approach an earlier study by Doyle found an association between placement and increased risk of pregnancy for girls. Bald et al (2019) found no significant effect for pregnancy and Font and Colleagues (2019) found a protective effect against early adolescent pregnancy. Finally, using Waves 1 and 3 of NSCAW I data -Orsi, Brown, Knight, and Shillington (2018) compared children ages 6-12 receiving in-home services to children not served on various developmental and sociobehavioral measures.…”
Section: Health and Behavioral Healthmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Methodological and statistical advances have led to improved data sources and analytic approaches. Nationally representative samples (e.g., NSCAW: Berger et al, 2009;Conn, Szilagyi, Jee, Blumkin, & Szilagyi, 2005); important large longitudinal studies using linked data from Alaska (Parrish, Fleckman, Prindle, Eastman, & Weil, 2020), Wisconsin [Berger, Cancian, Han, Noyes, & Rios-Salas, 2015)], Missouri (Jonson-Reid, Drake, & Kohl, 2009), California (Putnam-Hornstein, Needell, King, and Johnson-Motoyama (2013); and North Carolina (Barth, Duncan, Hodorowicz, & Kum, 2010); greater use of econometric tools (e.g, Doyle, 2013;Gross, 2020;Parrish et al, 2020); propensity score analysis (e.g., Berger et al, 2009;Berzin, 2008); and more standardized measurement of outcomes (e.g., Bald, Chyn, Hastings, & Machelett, 2019) have generated important new findings related to child wellbeing outcomes of CPS and CWS involvement.…”
Section: Conceptual Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…1 However, these findings for MTO adults may not be a good guide for understanding the effects of neighborhoods and poverty on the eventual voting behavior of children. 2 Prior research demonstrates that conditions in childhood have distinct and large impacts on a number of longerrun outcomes (Garces et al, 2002;Chetty et al, 2011;Heckman et al, 2013;Chetty et al, 2016;Hoynes et al, 2016;Carrell et al, 2018;Bald et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%