1965
DOI: 10.1177/001872676501800103
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Causal Texture of Organizational Environments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
859
0
72

Year Published

1997
1997
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2,289 publications
(937 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
6
859
0
72
Order By: Relevance
“…Alignment refers to the nature of the interactions between the external environment and the organization (Emery and Trist 1965;Thompson 1967;Pfeffer and Salancik 1978), the organization's strategy and structure (Chandler 1966), and the organization's structure and behavioral capabilities (Katz and Kahn 1978;Kimberly 1984). When a partnership is designing a governance structure that is most suitable for coordinating its activities, the partners must simultaneously decide on the nature and scope of the problems they wish to address, consider the external environment, select the appropriate strategy for accomplishing the partnership's goals, and take into account the membership composition and task complexity.…”
Section: Alignmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alignment refers to the nature of the interactions between the external environment and the organization (Emery and Trist 1965;Thompson 1967;Pfeffer and Salancik 1978), the organization's strategy and structure (Chandler 1966), and the organization's structure and behavioral capabilities (Katz and Kahn 1978;Kimberly 1984). When a partnership is designing a governance structure that is most suitable for coordinating its activities, the partners must simultaneously decide on the nature and scope of the problems they wish to address, consider the external environment, select the appropriate strategy for accomplishing the partnership's goals, and take into account the membership composition and task complexity.…”
Section: Alignmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The potency of structure and its interaction with culture and the environment, as well as its effects on communication processes, is understood from, for example, the early work of organizational theorists (Emory & Trist, 1965;Hall, 1972;Lawrence & Lorsch, 1967;Pugh, 1973;Selznick, 1949;Thompson, J.D., 1967aThompson, J.D., , 1967bThompson, V.A., 1977;Thompson & Bates, 1957;Woodward, 1958). Their studies laid the foundation for empirical research that relied on an open systems approach and brought into sharper focus the role of the environment in corporate and public sector settings and its contributions to public policy decisions and organizational learning (e.g., Alford, 1975;Feldman, 1989;Hall & Quinn, 1983;Meyer & Scott, 1983;Pheffer & Salancik, 1974, 1978Pressman & Wildavsky, 1973;Robbin, 1984;Scott & Christenson, 1995;Scott et al, 1994;Wildavsky, 1979).…”
Section: Discussion: Locating Explanation In Theories Of the Social Lmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[36], or through lobbying the governments. The part of the environment amenable to an organization's influence is sometimes referred to as its transactional environment [37] where, as described by van der Heijden, "the organization is a significant player, influencing outcomes as much as being influenced by them" [23, p.115]. He calls the part of organization's environment, "which has important repercussions for the organization but in which it has little or no influence" its contextual environment.…”
Section: Terminologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The biggest limitation is the flip-side of its strength: a step-by-step guide for creating scenarios. Given such a systematic (37) process, it is easy to get into an "auto-pilot" mode and go through the motions of completing various process steps without fully engaging in the process. Users of these processes need to guard against this tendency.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%