1980
DOI: 10.1001/archinte.1980.00330160097035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Cause and Clinical Significance of Diastolic Heart Sounds

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1984
1984
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The auscultated S 3 and S 4 have long been used as clinical signs of heart disease, with diagnostic and prognostic importance. [2][3][4][5][6][7] However, the value of these physical findings has been diminished by reports of poor accuracy and interobserver reliability. 8,9 As an objective instrument that supplies measurable data, the phonocardiogram has traditionally been the criterion (gold) standard tool for the detection of ventricular gallop sounds.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The auscultated S 3 and S 4 have long been used as clinical signs of heart disease, with diagnostic and prognostic importance. [2][3][4][5][6][7] However, the value of these physical findings has been diminished by reports of poor accuracy and interobserver reliability. 8,9 As an objective instrument that supplies measurable data, the phonocardiogram has traditionally been the criterion (gold) standard tool for the detection of ventricular gallop sounds.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using acoustic cardiography on short recordings, detection of a third heart sound has been correlated to elevated LV end-diastolic pressure and reduced ejection fraction [21], and in emergency department patients with signs or symptoms of acute decompensated heart failure has been found to be specific for primary heart failure [22]. We found a hypertrophy [23], and with worse prognosis following myocardial infarction [24]. Detected by auscultation or phonocardiography in healthy persons, the prevalence of the S4 was as high as 73% and considered, by some, to be a normal result of aging [25,26] Second, acoustic cardiography measurements are not calculated for heart rates greater than 150 bpm, which has not been a problem in this study population.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…The auscultated S 3 and S 4 have long been used as clinical signs of heart disease with both diagnostic and prognostic importance. 18–23 However, the value of these physical findings has been diminished by reports of poor accuracy and a large degree of interobserver variability 24,25 . In addition, it has been well documented that physician physical examination skills have deteriorated and are not emphasized during training as much as they once were 26 .…”
Section: Heart Sounds and Systolic Time Intervalsmentioning
confidence: 99%