The Causes and Consequences of the Second Karabakh War

Askerov, Ali; Ibadoghlu, Gubad

doi:10.4324/9781003261209-15

Cited by 4 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Sytuacja w Górskim Karabachu, który znajdował się pod okupacją Armenii od 1992 r., uległa radykalnej zmianie w wyniku tzw. drugiej wojny karabaskiej w 2020 r., kiedy Azerbejdżan przejął kontrolę nad ok. 75% Górskiego Karabachu 33 , aczkolwiek tereny wokół Chankendi (Stepanakertu) nadal pozostawały pod kontrolą Armenii. Na podstawie trójstronnego oświadczenia o zawieszeniu broni z 9 listopada 2020 r. do regionu Górskiego Karabachu wprowadzono rosyjski kontyngent poko-jowy, umieszczając go wzdłuż linii kontaktu między wojskami azerbejdżańskimi i armeńskimi, oraz w Korytarzu Laczyńskim, na okres pięciu lat z możliwością automatycznego wydłużenia na kolejne pięć lat, jeżeli oświadczenie nie zostanie wypowiedziane przez żadną ze stron.…”

Section: Inne Naruszenia Praw Człowieka I Dalszy Rozwój Sytuacjiunclassified

Prawa człowieka w państwach de facto na Kaukazie Południowym w orzecznictwie Europejskiego Trybunału Praw Człowieka

Sieniawski

2024

POLISPOL

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Celem artykułu jest analiza sytuacji w zakresie praw człowieka w państwach nieuznawanych w regionie Kaukazu Południowego w oparciu o orzecznictwo Europejskiego Trybunału Praw Człowieka. Przeanalizowano także problematykę przypisania odpowiedzialności państwu, które sprawuje efektywną kontrolę nad państwem de facto. Artykuł wskazuje również na niedawny rozwój sytuacji po wykluczeniu Federacji Rosyjskiej z Rady Europy i rozwiązaniu Republiki Górskiego Karabachu.

show abstract

Section: Inne Naruszenia Praw Człowieka I Dalszy Rozwój Sytuacjiunclassified

Prawa człowieka w państwach de facto na Kaukazie Południowym w orzecznictwie Europejskiego Trybunału Praw Człowieka

Sieniawski

2024

POLISPOL

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Unlike neighbouring Turkey, Iran and Azerbaijan however, Armenia is a Christian country, and international divisions are evident on ethno-religious as well as socio-cultural lines. The pattern of antagonism between Azerbaijan and Armenia is shaped by Nagorno-Karabakh, where territorial ethnic violence has caused widespread death and displacement, and political and military control remains heavily disputed (Askerov 2020).…”

Section: The Political Context Of Azerbaijanmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…This resulted in pogroms, notably in Baku, Sumgait and Kirovabad (now Ganja). In the early 1990s, independent Armenia changed its stance, claiming the right of self-determination for Armenians in Nagorno-Karabakh (Askerov 2020).…”

Section: 'Descending Into the Third World': The Nagorno-karabakh Conf...mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The established pattern of antagonism between Azerbaijan and neighbouring Armenia in particular has fostered strained relations, notably regarding Nagorno-Karabakh (Cornell 2017). The struggle for the political and military control of this territory which lies within Azerbaijani borders came to define aspects of its national identity and remains heavily disputed (Askerov 2020). Beyond Baku, many Azerbaijani citizens have lived in relative poverty, whilst those residing in and near Nagorno-Karabakh have experienced sustained, fractious instability.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

From sport-for-development to sports mega-events: conflict, authoritarian modernisation and statecraft in Azerbaijan

Rookwood

2023

The Sport Mega-Events of the 2020s

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Azerbaijan has considerable energy resources and exports oil across the world. Some of the resultant wealth has been reinvested, primarily centralised in Baku and concentrated on specific projects. This has shaped ambitious nation-building efforts including staging major events. Baku hosted the 2019 men's UEFA Europa League final and four UEFA Euro 2020 matches. This article analyses these sporting events in relation to Azerbaijan's political system, providing a lens through which Azerbaijani statecraft and authoritarian modernisation is examined. It also explores a 2004 sport-for-development project implemented 320 kilometres from Baku. This juxtaposition and frame of reference emphasises some key issues facing Azerbaijan and contextualises the subsequent modernisation and impact of hosting events. Data are examined from interviews conducted in 2004, 2019 and 2021 comprising international aid workers, civilians, translators and event spectators. This longitudinal study investigates Azerbaijan's political context and conflicts, sport-for-development, energy wealth, modernisation projects, sports event hosting and statecraft.

show abstract

“…Despite being nearly four hundred kilometers away from the contested territories of Nagorno-Karabakh, military presence and paraphernalia proliferate across public and private space within the capital city-from military supply trucks stationed in downtown parking lots, army recruitment ads towering above commuters in metro stations, to creaseless Azerbaijani flags decorating courtyards and gardens. Framed by the ongoing conflict between Azerbaijan and Armenia (1987 to present day), residential developments (yaşayış məntəqəsi), gardens/backyards (yaşıl sahələr), and makeshift settlements (müvəqqəti məskunlaşma) have turned into sites where the local population actively engages with ideas of nation-making, post-conflict futures, and the potential restoration of territorial integrity (Askerov 2020). Feelings of both homeliness and unhomeliness pervade these spaces, with potent affective landscapes influencing political identity, forms of inhabitation, and everyday habits.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Properties of War: The Militarization of Housing Policy and Urban Planning in Contemporary Azerbaijan

Ihar

2023

Catalyst

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

War has defined Azerbaijan for more than three decades. The unresolved conflict over the territory of Nagorno-Karabakh has not only structured the sociopolitical climate of the nation but also everyday relations and the very manner in which both the private home and the homeland is imagined. Increasingly, the line has blurred between housing policy and military strategy, with desires for greater securitization and armament seeping into proprietary arrangements, construction plans, and mainstream narratives surrounding the domestic. I examine three sites where inhabitation has seemingly become inextricable from the military apparatus — a state-sponsored apartment block for the families of martyrs (şəhid ailəsi) and those disabled by war (müharibə əlillərinə), a newly built housing complex for servicemen (yüksək rütbəli hərbçilər), and, finally, a makeshift settlement for internally displaced people (məcburi köçkünlər). In these spaces, both temporal and material qualities of war seep into the quotidian, informing the ways in which individuals negotiate the intimate aftermaths of violence, injury, and severed relation. Whilst the article begins by examining state-sponsored settlement forged along lines of allegiance, masculinized duty, and capacity, it concludes by attending to moments that upend oppressive forms of homemaking.

show abstract

The Causes and Consequences of the Second Karabakh War

Cited by 4 publications

References 0 publications

Prawa człowieka w państwach de facto na Kaukazie Południowym w orzecznictwie Europejskiego Trybunału Praw Człowieka

Prawa człowieka w państwach de facto na Kaukazie Południowym w orzecznictwie Europejskiego Trybunału Praw Człowieka

From sport-for-development to sports mega-events: conflict, authoritarian modernisation and statecraft in Azerbaijan

Properties of War: The Militarization of Housing Policy and Urban Planning in Contemporary Azerbaijan

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About