2012
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6419.2011.00717.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Causes of Childhood Obesity: A Survey

Abstract: Childhood obesity rates are rapidly rising in many countries. Since it is highly likely that obesity will persist into adulthood, current rates undermine the health and future of people in developed as well as developing countries. This public health epidemic carries significant economic, social as well as individual-level consequences and has become a research topic of significant interest for various disciplines including economics. We survey the literature in economics and related disciplines associated wit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 206 publications
(265 reference statements)
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Family-environmental determinants have been associated with energy-balance related behaviours, although little is known about socio-economic disparities in these associations. A survey reviewing multi-disciplinary literature to identify the determinants of childhood obesity, concluded, among others, that the shared environment created by parents, affects children’s choices and eventually their body weight outcomes [ 42 ]. Related evidence demonstrates that parental rules and/or accessibility at home are significantly associated with energy balance- related behaviours, such as screen time, intake of sugary drinks and fruit and vegetable consumption [ 22 , 43 , 44 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Family-environmental determinants have been associated with energy-balance related behaviours, although little is known about socio-economic disparities in these associations. A survey reviewing multi-disciplinary literature to identify the determinants of childhood obesity, concluded, among others, that the shared environment created by parents, affects children’s choices and eventually their body weight outcomes [ 42 ]. Related evidence demonstrates that parental rules and/or accessibility at home are significantly associated with energy balance- related behaviours, such as screen time, intake of sugary drinks and fruit and vegetable consumption [ 22 , 43 , 44 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding healthrelated behaviors, Meng (2012) document an association between obesity and lack of sleep in urban children; Li et al (2010) believe a 20-min-per-day vigorous physical activity could effectively prevent childhood obesity, and that insufficient physical activity could lead to childhood obesity; and Shang (2012) find a positive correlation between childhood obesity and sugarsweetened beverage intake. Regarding social causes of childhood obesity, papers examine family income, parents' working status, environment, and other factors (e.g., Anderson & Butcher, 2006;Dehghan, Akhtar-Danesh, & Merchant, 2005;Ebbeling, Pawlak, & Ludwig, 2002;Papoutsi, Drichoutis, & Nayga, 2011). Most papers studying Western economies identify a positive correlation between childhood obesity and low socioeconomic status, which differs from the situation in China.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The home setting, especially parents, plays a vital role in the associations between SES and children’s screen time. According to socioecological models [ 13 , 14 ], parents’ attitudes, beliefs, norms, and behaviors shape and create a shared social and physical environment in the home setting, and this environment affects children’s possibilities for different types of behaviors [ 13 15 ]. For example, higher parental self-efficacy to limit screen time is associated with less children’s screen time [ 16 ], whereas availability of media equipment and lack of physical activity (PA) equipment are associated with increased children’s screen time [ 17 , 18 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%