1987
DOI: 10.1109/tgrs.1987.289806
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The CCRS SAR/MSS Anderson River Data Set

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the single classifier methods in Tables V and VI, the MED and ML showed different characteristics. The MED was not acceptable in terms of classification accuracies, but the ML accuracies were rela -TABLE VI TEST ACCURACIES IN PERCENTAGE FOR THE DIFFERENT CLASSIFICATION METHODS APPLIED TO THE ANDERSON RIVER DATASET tively good, especially considering that the data are clearly not Gaussian [21]. The j4.8 method outperformed the other single classifier methods in terms of both training and test accuracies and achieved an overall accuracy for test data of 70.8%.…”
Section: B Anderson River Datasetmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For the single classifier methods in Tables V and VI, the MED and ML showed different characteristics. The MED was not acceptable in terms of classification accuracies, but the ML accuracies were rela -TABLE VI TEST ACCURACIES IN PERCENTAGE FOR THE DIFFERENT CLASSIFICATION METHODS APPLIED TO THE ANDERSON RIVER DATASET tively good, especially considering that the data are clearly not Gaussian [21]. The j4.8 method outperformed the other single classifier methods in terms of both training and test accuracies and achieved an overall accuracy for test data of 70.8%.…”
Section: B Anderson River Datasetmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…In the second experiment, the Anderson River dataset, which is a multisource remote sensing and geographic dataset made available by the Canada Centre for Remote Sensing (CCRS) [21], was used. This dataset is very difficult to classify [6] due to a number of mixed forest type classes.…”
Section: B Anderson River Datasetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The data used in the second experiment, the Anderson River data set, are a multisource remote sensing and geographic data set made available by the Canada Centre for Remote Sensing (CCRS), Ottawa, Ontario [32]. The imagery involves a 2.8 km by 2.8 km forestry site in the Anderson River area of British Columbia, Canada.…”
Section: B Experiments 2: Anderson River Data Setmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The data used in the second experiment, the Anderson River data set, are a multisource remote sensing and geographic data set made available by the Canada Centre for Remote Sensing (CCRS) [32]. This data set is very difficult to classify.…”
Section: B Experiments 2: Anderson River Data Setmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The area is characterized by rugged topography, with terrain elevations ranging from 330 m to 1100 m above sea level. The forest cover is primarily coniferus, with Douglas fir predominating up to approximately 1050 m elevation, and cedar, hemlock and spruce types predominating at higher elevations [32]. Six data sources were used: 1) Airborne Multispectral Scanner (AMSS) with 11 spectral data channels (ten channels from 380 to 1100 nm and one channel from 8 to 14 m).…”
Section: B Experiments 2: Anderson River Data Setmentioning
confidence: 99%