2007
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-4781.2007.00627_7.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The CEFR and Education Policies in Europe

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
7
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Particularly, CEFR has been observed to have such major influences in language policy planning [3], [4], [20], [27], [26] [8], [10], [11], [21], [29], [31].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Particularly, CEFR has been observed to have such major influences in language policy planning [3], [4], [20], [27], [26] [8], [10], [11], [21], [29], [31].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the Council of Europe offers advice or advocacy, policy guidelines at EU level tend to be concrete and binding. Education remains outside the EU's direct control, according to the “principle of subsidiarity.” However, EU decisions may strongly impact on education policies (Bonnet, 2007, p. 670).…”
Section: Language Policy and The Cefrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, Bonnet (2007) openly calls for "policing" of the CEFR levels with reference to assessment. However not all agree on the need for external control and imposing it would be daunting.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CEFR-based policies drive a language certification market based on claims of proficiency at various CEFR levels. For Bonnet (2007) this raises quality assurance issues, as countless bodies issue certificates or diplomas based on exams that supposedly demonstrate linguistic competence at a specific level. Indeed, the Council of Europe (henceforth CoE) (Council of Europe 2008) recognises that employers and admission authorities must ever more frequently evaluate the value of language qualifications on the basis of little or no reliable information.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%