2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2022.08.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The cellular basis for synergy between RCO and KNOX1 homeobox genes in leaf shape diversity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Why would these genes be predisposed to regulating morphological change? We propose that GT1 and VRS1 occupy a conserved position within the genetic network that allows them to regulate morphological characters without a high level of pleiotropy, and thus they may be more likely to gain and retain new roles within development (Martin & Orgogozo, 2013; Stern & Orgogozo, 2009; Uller et al, 2018; Wang et al, 2022). The capacity of these genes to repress growth across diverse species also supports this idea (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Why would these genes be predisposed to regulating morphological change? We propose that GT1 and VRS1 occupy a conserved position within the genetic network that allows them to regulate morphological characters without a high level of pleiotropy, and thus they may be more likely to gain and retain new roles within development (Martin & Orgogozo, 2013; Stern & Orgogozo, 2009; Uller et al, 2018; Wang et al, 2022). The capacity of these genes to repress growth across diverse species also supports this idea (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…26,2837 To this end, we took advantage of the fact that KNOX1 and RCO genes are sufficient to increase leaf complexity when ectopically expressed in A. thaliana leaves. 17,38,39 We found that they create lobes or leaflets in adult (leaf8) but not juvenile leaves (leaf1) of A. thaliana (Figure 4A), despite discernible expression in both (Figures 4B-4D’) - which is also the case in the C. hirsuta endogenous context (Figures 4E-4F’). These observations indicate that the adult developmental context is an essential prerequisite for these two homeobox genes to increase leaf complexity.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…To further investigate how PAVs affect fruit quality traits in pears, we identified genes showing significant differences in PAV occurrence frequency between Asian and European pear populations that are functionally associated with fruit shape, aroma, color, stone cells, and fruit hardness. In total, we identified 192 fruit quality traits associated genes ( Table S18 ), with homologous six genes exhibiting significant correlations with fruit shape development, including transcription repressor gene OFP16 ( PsbM011G02493 and PsbM005G03117 ) (Snouffer et al, 2020), homeobox protein knotted-1-like gene KNOX1 ( Pco_Presence_Seq_006877 ) (Wang et al, 2022), SUN domain-containing protein 5 gene ( Pdr_Presence_Seq_013651 ) (Ma et al, 2022), and TRM (PsbM003G00721 and Pco_Presence_Seq_003059 ) (Zhang et al, 2023). For example, the gene PsbM005G03117 is present in all Asian pear accessions but less than half of European pear accessions (Occurency frequency: 0.55) (Differential occurrence frequency: 0.45, P-value: 1.54E-08), while PsbM011G02493 showing a different pattern than present in all European pear accessions and near three-quarters of Asian pear accessions (Occurrency frequency: 0.72) (Differential occurrence frequency: 0.28, P-value: 1.06E-05).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%