1995
DOI: 10.1128/aem.61.9.3288-3292.1995
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The cellular location of Prevotella ruminicola beta-1,4-D-endoglucanase and its occurrence in other strains of ruminal bacteria

Abstract: Prevotella ruminicola B 1 4, TC1-1, TF1-3, and TS1-5 all produced immunologically cross-reacting 88-and 82-kDa carboxymethyl cellulases (CMCases). P. ruminicola 23, 118B, 20-63, and 20-78 had much lower CMCase activities, and Western blots (immunoblots) showed no cross-reaction with the B 1 4 CMCase antiserum. Fibrobacter succinogenes S85 and Selenomonas ruminantium HD4 and D produced CMCases, but these enzymes were smaller and did not cross-react with the B 1 4 CMCase antiserum. The B 1 4 CMCase antiserum inh… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although CMCase is produced by other bacteria that do not degrade polymeric cellulose, we assumed that CMCase reflected a cumulative response to cellulolysis. In support, Prevotella ruminicola increased CMCase considerably when grown on cellobiose than on sucrose (Gardner et al, 1995), and complete degradation of cellulose probably involves a consortium of primary cellulolytic and secondary noncellulolytic bacteria (Wells et al, 1995). Changes in ruminal NDF degradability were proportionately associated with particle-bound CMCase activity (Huhtanen and Khalili, 1992;Piwonka et al, 1994).…”
Section: Nutrient Digestibilitymentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Although CMCase is produced by other bacteria that do not degrade polymeric cellulose, we assumed that CMCase reflected a cumulative response to cellulolysis. In support, Prevotella ruminicola increased CMCase considerably when grown on cellobiose than on sucrose (Gardner et al, 1995), and complete degradation of cellulose probably involves a consortium of primary cellulolytic and secondary noncellulolytic bacteria (Wells et al, 1995). Changes in ruminal NDF degradability were proportionately associated with particle-bound CMCase activity (Huhtanen and Khalili, 1992;Piwonka et al, 1994).…”
Section: Nutrient Digestibilitymentioning
confidence: 90%
“…1). Prevotella species are recognized as the major groups in the rumen [15], and some Prevotella strains from the rumen possess endoglucanase and xylanase activities [16,17] but do not degrade cell wall material extensively in pure culture [15]. The isolation of many Prevotella-like clones from ruminally incubated hay stems suggests indirect concern of these bacteria with ruminal ¢ber breakdown possibly as oligosaccharide and xylan fermenters.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This result is consistent with findings regarding the rumen solid and liquid fractions of dairy cattle fed ryegrass or white clover (Bowen et al, 2018) and a TMR (forage:concentrate = 70:30, forage = prewilted grass and maize silage) (De Mulder et al, 2017) and the rumen contents and epithelium of dairy cattle fed a TMR (forage:concentrate = 55:45, forage = corn silage and corn stover) (Liu et al, 2016). Prevotella represents one of the most abundant genera in the rumen; this genus exhibits genetic and metabolic diversity (Bekele et al, 2010) and plays roles in carbohydrate utilization (Dehority, 1966;Cotta, 1992;Gardner et al, 1995;Kabel et al, 2011), nitrogen metabolism (Kim et al, 2017), and fiber degradation (Mayorga et al, 2016). The results of these study suggest the importance of Prevotella spp.…”
Section: Differences In Bacterial Community Structure Among the Solidmentioning
confidence: 99%