1994
DOI: 10.1128/mcb.14.10.6896
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The cellular transcription factor USF cooperates with varicella-zoster virus immediate-early protein 62 to symmetrically activate a bidirectional viral promoter.

Abstract: The mechanisms governing the function of cellular USF and herpesvirus immediate-early transcription factors are subjects of considerable interest. In this regard, we identified a novel form of coordinate gene regulation involving a cooperative interplay between cellular USF and the varicella-zoster virus immediateearly protein 62 (IE 62). A single USF-binding site defines the potential level of IE 62-dependent activation of a bidirectional viral early promoter of the DNA polymerase and major DNA-binding protei… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

9
109
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 100 publications
(118 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
9
109
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The slight inhibitory e ect of overexpressed dominant mutant DUSF2 on rRNA synthesis may be due to sequestering of endogenous 44 or 43 kDa which causes low level of endogenous 44/43 heterodimer available in the rDNA transcription initiation complex. Such sequestering e ect of USF has also been suggested for the regulation of a bi-directional viral promoter (Meier et al, 1994) and L-type pyruvate kinase gene promoter (Lefrancois Martinez et al, 1995). Co-expression of USF1 and DUSF2 does not alter pol I transcription (data not shown).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The slight inhibitory e ect of overexpressed dominant mutant DUSF2 on rRNA synthesis may be due to sequestering of endogenous 44 or 43 kDa which causes low level of endogenous 44/43 heterodimer available in the rDNA transcription initiation complex. Such sequestering e ect of USF has also been suggested for the regulation of a bi-directional viral promoter (Meier et al, 1994) and L-type pyruvate kinase gene promoter (Lefrancois Martinez et al, 1995). Co-expression of USF1 and DUSF2 does not alter pol I transcription (data not shown).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…pSGU44 or USF2 was constructed by inserting the end-®lled EcoRI ± NsiI fragment of USF44 cDNA (mouse) into BamHI site of pSG5 eucaryotic expression vector (see Lin et al, 1994 and Figure 1D). pSGU44DB or DUSF2 was made by deleting the basic DNA-binding domain (aa 229 to aa 249) of mouse USF2 inserted in pSG5 vector (see Meier et al, 1994 and Figure 1E). pSV-b-Galactosidase (pSV-b-gal) was obtained from Promega.…”
Section: Plasmid Constructsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Derivation of the pSG5-derived psvUSF1, psvUSF2 and pUSF2DN (pU2DN) expression vectors was previously reported (Meier et al, 1994;Luo and Sawadogo, 1996a,b). Vector alone controls for these expression vectors were provided by transfecting the pSG424 vector containing the same SV40 promoter (Sadowski et al, 1988) instead of the parental pSG5 vector, which, for unknown reasons, strongly inhibited the transcription of cotransfected reporters in several of the cell lines.…”
Section: Plasmidsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A 0.97 kb fragment bearing the ribosomal protein L-30 processed gene (Meyuhas et al, 1987), linking the 5' and 3' regions of the p3A fragment, was used as a control for loading an equivalent amount of total RNA. A 2.2 kb fragment of mouse b-actin (Avni et al, 1994) and a 1.9 kb fragment of USF1 (Meier et al, 1994) were also used as probes for this study. The DNA fragments were labeled with 32 P-dCTP (Amersham) using the random primed labeling technique (Feinberg and Vogelstein, 1983) up to a speci®c activity of 3610 8 c.p.m./mg.…”
Section: Dna Probesmentioning
confidence: 99%