2000
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4612-1182-2_5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Central Auditory System of Reptiles and Birds

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
59
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 217 publications
1
59
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the avian auditory brain stem, acoustic timing and intensity cues are processed in separate ascending pathways, then reconverge in the midbrain to generate a map of auditory space (Carr and Code 2000;Konishi 1978a, 1978b;Konishi et al 1985Konishi et al , 1988Moiseff and Konishi 1983;Sullivan and Konishi 1984;Takahashi et al 1984). The two anatomically distinct cochlear nuclei, nucleus magnocellularis (NM) and nucleus angularis (NA), each receive information from the auditory nerve and specialize for encoding timing information (NM) and intensity, or sound level, information (NA) for the computation of sound location (Boord 1968;Carr and Boudreau 1991;Parks and Rubel 1978;Puelles et al 2007;Reyes et al 1994;Sullivan and Konishi 1984;Trussell 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the avian auditory brain stem, acoustic timing and intensity cues are processed in separate ascending pathways, then reconverge in the midbrain to generate a map of auditory space (Carr and Code 2000;Konishi 1978a, 1978b;Konishi et al 1985Konishi et al , 1988Moiseff and Konishi 1983;Sullivan and Konishi 1984;Takahashi et al 1984). The two anatomically distinct cochlear nuclei, nucleus magnocellularis (NM) and nucleus angularis (NA), each receive information from the auditory nerve and specialize for encoding timing information (NM) and intensity, or sound level, information (NA) for the computation of sound location (Boord 1968;Carr and Boudreau 1991;Parks and Rubel 1978;Puelles et al 2007;Reyes et al 1994;Sullivan and Konishi 1984;Trussell 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inasmuch as these terminals are perisomatic, they resemble the endbulb synapses in the avian NM and the mammalian AVCN, and the similarities suggest that they represent a homologous population corresponding to the NM of birds and turtles (Belekhova et al, 2008;Carr and Code, 2000;Grothe et al, 2005). Szpir et al (1990) labeled individual axons and noted larger axosomatic terminals in NMM than in the other first-order nuclei.…”
Section: Organization Of the First-order Nucleimentioning
confidence: 86%
“…The nucleus angularis projects to the superior olive, to the lemniscal nuclei, and to the central nucleus of the auditory midbrain. The parallel ascending projections of angularis and laminaris may or may not overlap with one another and probably do overlap in the primitive condition (for reviews see Carr, 1992;Carr and Code, 2000). The connections of the central auditory system are well known in mammals and follow a similar ascending trajectory (for reviews see Grothe et al, 2005;Rouiller, 1997).…”
Section: Nih-pa Author Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations