The central banking system paradox

Abstract

The conventions of monetary theory assume the central banking system (CBS) as the starting point for achieving the stability and efficiency of the financial system. This paper stresses the stability-efficiency thesis based on the Austrian business cycle theory (ABCT). It argues that the stability-efficiency thesis under CBS poses a paradox for two main reasons. First, central banks' interest rate handling causes business cycles, yielding the intertemporal discoordination of the money and goods markets. Second, a central bank's lender-of-last-resort role is an incentive to call for further interest rate handling, making the chance of smooth business cycles difficult or impossible. This paradox is empirically analyzed and discussed through the True Money Supply (TMS) performance in the United States's business cycle phases between 1975 and 2022. Consistent with the ABCT, the research results unlock the paradox by showing that CBS causes business cycles. Some policy implications are outlined for further research and revision of monetary theory.

The political economy of fiscal dominance: Evidence from the Chilean government of Salvador Allende

“…The myth of the fiscal or multi-causal origin of inflation neglects the fact that there is no inflation in a barter economy. Inflation or deflation can appear only due to changes in money supply and demand (Espinosa et al, 2023;Bagus et al, 2014;Dornbusch & Fischer, 1986).…”

The relationship between monetary stability and central bank independence: The case of Azerbaijan

“…Some central banks at the time tended to avoid getting involved in these political disputes, which allowed them to take a more successful stance in maintaining price stability -a position that eventually served as a model for other nations -and preserve the value of mon-ey. In order to make their central banks independent, several nations that share this viewpoint have changed their legal frameworks (Hayo B.,1998;Bethlendi et al, 2019;Lentner et al, 2019;Szyszko & Rutkowska, 2022;Espinosa et al, 2023).…”