This article offers a holistic evolutionary perspective on dreaming and early sexual development.Going beyond Freud, and more in line with recent psychoanalysis and academic research, oedipality becomes part of understanding the development of sexual strategy, while dreaming is viewed as an evolved mechanism for moderating and updating affectively charged approach-avoidance conflicts associated with self-preservation and reproduction. The article suggests plausible evolutionary assumptions for interpretations of politics and expressive culture. [dreams, sexuality, human evolution, attachment, narrative, politics] In contrast to evolutionary psychologists who want to explain cultural practices in terms of gender differences in reproductive strategy, or who contend that human beings are essentially promiscuous and patriarchal, I propose here that a more productive and plausible evolutionary approach for anthropology focuses on love-or the lack of it-between men and women, and on how love is affected by danger, real and imaginary. Current thinking about dreaming and oedipality informs the argument. As Freud observed, dreams deal with desire and danger and, as he also observed, infantile oedipality can have consequences for love relations in adulthood, particularly for whether and how well individuals blend sensuality with affection. Drawing on neurobiology as well as evolutionary anthropology and primate behavior studies, I suggest that the major step in early hominid evolution was a conflicted and incomplete shift from dominance competition toward social cooperation and, simultaneously, from promiscuity toward pair bonding. The two orientations are seen to entail different responses to danger.For want of a better term, I use "oedipality" as a rubric for two emotional complexes, one associated with insecure attachment and the other with secure attachment. 1 In earlier articles, I reviewed studies that connect insecure attachment with multiple mating and secure attachment with pair bonding (Ingham 1999;Ingham and Spain 2005). Here, I combine further discussion of these findings with work on dreaming. Specifically, I review research indicating that early experience and rapid eye movement (REM) sleep are complementary in psychosexual development and that in adults, REM-sleep dreaming processes approachavoidance conflicts and updates emotional memories associated with mating, foraging, and threats to the self and loved ones. In conclusion, I consider implications of the argument for the interpretation of politics and ideological narratives.