2013
DOI: 10.1007/s10986-013-9200-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The central limit theorem for a sequence of random processes with space-varying long memory*

Abstract: In this paper we investigate a sequence of square integrable random processes with space varying memory. We establish sufficient conditions for the central limit theorem in the space L 2 (µ) for the partial sums of the sequence of random processes with space varying long memory. Of particular interest is a non-standard normalization of the partial sums in the central limit theorem.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The following two asymptotic relations are proved in Characiejus and Račkauskas [2]: if 1/2 < d(r) < 1 and 1/2 < d(s) < 1, then…”
Section: Random Polygonal Functions {ζ N }mentioning
confidence: 96%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The following two asymptotic relations are proved in Characiejus and Račkauskas [2]: if 1/2 < d(r) < 1 and 1/2 < d(s) < 1, then…”
Section: Random Polygonal Functions {ζ N }mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The first approach is to define {X k } as stochastic processes with space varying memory and square µ-integrable sample paths. The second approach is to define L 2 (µ) valued random variable X k for each k ≥ 1 as series (1) with u j given by (2) and to investigate the convergence of such series. We present both of these two approaches.…”
Section: Construction Of {X K }mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For further procedure we use a proof idea like Characiejus and Račkauskas (2013), first introduced in Račkauskas and Suquet (2011). It will make it possible to prove the theorem under the assumption of a Gaussian white noise process.…”
Section: Proof Of Theorem 21 and Corollary 22mentioning
confidence: 99%