2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.asd.2019.02.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The cephalic anatomy of workers of the ant species Wasmannia affinis (Formicidae, Hymenoptera, Insecta) and its evolutionary implications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
102
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(104 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
2
102
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To conclude, besides the above‐mentioned uncertainties that are common in regular practice in insect taxonomic research, morphometry has proven reproducible in our test setting. The best morphology, we believe, may be done through multimodal means, such as combining multiple microscopic and morphometric methods (e.g., Richter et al., 2019; Sarnat et al., 2019; Hita‐Garcia et al., 2019; Boudinot, 2019; Keklikoglou et al., 2019; Braga et al., 2019). Given the same size range of measured traits, the same range of observers' skill, and the same range of equipment, we expect the same reproducibility for other groups of arthropods, provided these have a similar exoskeleton stability and that specimens belong to a comparable developmental stage.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To conclude, besides the above‐mentioned uncertainties that are common in regular practice in insect taxonomic research, morphometry has proven reproducible in our test setting. The best morphology, we believe, may be done through multimodal means, such as combining multiple microscopic and morphometric methods (e.g., Richter et al., 2019; Sarnat et al., 2019; Hita‐Garcia et al., 2019; Boudinot, 2019; Keklikoglou et al., 2019; Braga et al., 2019). Given the same size range of measured traits, the same range of observers' skill, and the same range of equipment, we expect the same reproducibility for other groups of arthropods, provided these have a similar exoskeleton stability and that specimens belong to a comparable developmental stage.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Width of head including eyes Determines the size of gaps through which an individual can pass (Schofield et al 2016) and the volume of muscles powering the mandibles during foraging (Richter et al 2019).…”
Section: Head Widthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We present a detailed study of all the anatomical structures and organs in the coffee berry borer using micro-CT, with the exception of the respiratory system, which is presented separately 19 . This is in contrast to other insect-related micro-CT papers that focus on specific aspects such as cephalic anatomy 20 , metamorphosis 21,22 , tracheal systems 2328 , mycetangia 2931 , mandibular muscles 32 , the alimentary canal 33 , respiratory volume 34 , genitalia 35 and the brain 36 . Together with the study on the respiratory system 19 , this paper represents the first holistic view of the entire anatomy of the coffee berry borer, and to the best of our knowledge, is the smallest insect to have been subjected to micro-CT.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 82%