Keywords in-stent restenosis, bare metal stents, drug eluting stents, risk score, CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc Stent implantation is the default strategy for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).1 Acute recoil and residual dissections as well as late recoil, a major determinant of restenosis after balloon angioplasty, are prevented by stents.2,3 However, stenting induces vessel wall injury that promotes neointimal hyperplasia which is greater after bare metal stent (BMS) implantation than following balloon angioplasty.2,3 Nevertheless, the larger initial lumen gain and the elimination of acute and late recoil by BMS translates into a larger coronary lumen at follow-up and significantly reduced restenosis rates.
2,3However, in-stent restenosis (ISR) remains a major limitation of PCI.
4The main underlying mechanism of ISR is neointimal proliferation, though neoatherosclerosis has also been implicated. 4 Drug-eluting stents (DES) were introduced with the aim of inhibiting neointimal hyperplasia, but ISR may still occur, especially when DES are implanted in adverse clinical and anatomic scenarios. 4 In addition, DES require prolonged dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT).5 Some patients are unable to adhere to prolonged DAPT regimens or have a high risk of bleeding.5 Dual antiplatelet therapy is also a cause of concern in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) or any other condition requiring chronic oral anticoagulation.5 Finally, economic issues may limit the universal use of DES. These factors explain why a number of patients still receive a BMS.Several clinical, angiographic, and procedure-related factors have been implicated in the pathogenesis of ISR.6-9 Among the clinical factors, diabetes emerges as the most important risk factor for aggressive neointimal proliferation.8 Vessel size and lesion length represent key determinants for recurrent stenosis after stent implantation.6-9 Suboptimal stent implantation (mainly underexpansion) secondary to either a poor deployment technique or complex anatomy has been related to late stent failure. 4 However, predicting ISR risk in an individual patient remains a challenge. [6][7][8][9] In a previous issue of Angiology, Yilmaz et al 10 assessed the potential of the CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score to predict the occurrence of ISR after BMS implantation in patients free from AF. The CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score assigns 1 point for congestive heart failure, hypertension, age 65 to 74 years, diabetes mellitus, vascular disease and female sex, and 2 points for age 75 years or older and previous stroke.11 In this study, patients (n ¼ 1350) undergoing successful BMS implantation were retrospectively analyzed; 700 of these patients were included in the final analysis (age 61.4 + 9 years, 63% men). The mean time from initial stent implantation to late coronary angiography was 14.2 + 3.5 months. At late follow-up, 265 (38%) patients developed ISR. Those presenting with ISR more frequently had diabetes, hyperlipidemia, history of cerebrovascular events, or heart failure and were more frequently smokers. Left ...