The chains on all my people are the chains on me: Restrictions to collective autonomy undermine the personal autonomy and psychological well-being of group members.

Abstract

Four studies assessed the potentially detrimental effects that restrictions to collective autonomy (i.e., a group's freedom to determine and practice its own identity) may have for the personal autonomy and psychological well-being of group members. In Study 1, using 3 distinct samples (NSample1a = 123, NSample1b = 129, NSample1c = 370), correlational and cross-cultural evidence indicates that perceived restrictions to the collective autonomy of one's group is directly associated with reduced personal autonomy, and indirectly associated with diminished well-being through personal autonomy. In Study 2 (N = 411), a longitudinal assessment of group members over 3 time-points during a 4-month period found that group members who perceived greater collective autonomy restriction also experienced reduced personal autonomy, and in turn, reduced psychological well-being over time. In Study 3 (N = 255), group members described a time during which their ingroup had (or did not have) its collective autonomy unduly restricted by other groups. Participants who were primed to think that their group lacked collective autonomy reported reduced feelings of personal autonomy, and reduced psychological well-being (compared with those primed to think their group had collective autonomy). In Study 4 (N = 389), collective autonomy was manipulated within the context of an intensive laboratory simulation. Collective autonomy-restricted group members experienced less personal autonomy than those who did not have their collective autonomy restricted. Together these findings suggest that restrictions to a group's collective autonomy may have detrimental consequences for the personal autonomy and psychological well-being of group members. (PsycINFO Database Record

The Need for Inclusion: The relationships between Relational and Collective inclusion needs and psychological well‐and ill‐being

“…The present results are also related to some recent work that integrates Self‐Determination Theory (Deci & Ryan, ; Vansteenkiste et al, ) and Social Identity Theory (see Amiot, Sansfaçon, Louis, & Yelle, ; Thomas, Amiot, Louis, & Goddard, ; see also Kachanoff, Taylor, Caouette, Khullar, & Wohl, ). According to this approach, people often act as group members and they can perceive their behavior as being collectively motivated, which has been coined as “collective self‐determination”.…”

“…The present results are also related to some recent work that integrates Self-Determination Theory (Deci & Ryan, 2000;Vansteenkiste et al, 2006) and Social Identity Theory (see Amiot, Sansfaçon, Louis, & Yelle, 2012;Thomas, Amiot, Louis, & Goddard, 2017; see also Kachanoff, Taylor, Caouette, Khullar, & Wohl, 2019).…”

Measuring Realistic and Symbolic Threats of COVID-19 and their Unique Impacts on Wellbeing and Adherence to Public Health Behaviors

“…Stephan and colleagues' (2009) definition of symbolic threat cited above, while one item assessed threat to the freedom of one's national group (Kachanoff, Taylor, Caouette, Khullar, & Wohl, 2019) 3.…”

Basic psychological need theory: Advancements, critical themes, and future directions

“…Methodological improvements SDT research has from the outset iterated between observational (e.g., Deci et al 1993;Grolnick et al 1984) and self-report (e.g., Grolnick and Ryan 1989) methods. As the research evolved, scholars have made use of an increasing variety of methods, including longitudinal designs (e.g., Garn et al 2019), multi-informant and/or observational measures of need-support (Bindman et al 2015), and multilevel analyses to separate betweenperson, within-person (Mabbe et al 2018) and betweengroup effects (Kachanoff et al 2019).…”