Real reasons behind the crisisFrom a sense-making perspective, the list of issues can be broadly grouped into four main categories, namely research methodology, policies, ethics and systemic or institutional issues and research methodology. These categories overlap and cross-pollinate, which makes it almost impossible to address them individually. Understanding and correcting these are going to require a holistic and integrated approach. The overemphasis on aspects such as replicability suggests that many do not fully understand the underlying dynamics causing the crisis (Salteli & Funtowicz, 2017).Problemification: In recent years, the so-called publication crisis has reached alarming proportions, and the psychology and industrial psychology profession are not left unscathed. Efendic and van Zyl investigated the crisis and emphasised on open science practices as a strategy to address the issues.Implications: This article argues that the problem is much deeper than a matter of replication and should be approached from a systemic and holistic perspective. The author argues that the root causes can be grouped into four main categories, namely policies, ethics, systemic or institutional and research methodology. Unless the root causes are not addressed, the crisis will deepen.Purpose: The purpose of this article is to reflect on Efendic and van Zyl's analysis and offer additional insights.Recommendations: A number of additional strategies are offered to address the real problems behind the replication problem.