2013
DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2013-101458
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The challenge of crafting policy for do-it-yourself brain stimulation

Abstract: Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), a simple means of brain stimulation, possesses a trifecta of appealing features: it is relatively safe, relatively inexpensive and relatively effective. It is also relatively easy to obtain a device and the do-it-yourself (DIY) community has become galvanised by reports that tDCS can be used as an all-purpose cognitive enhancer. We provide practical recommendations designed to guide balanced discourse, propagate norms of safe use and stimulate dialogue between th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
72
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
72
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…(Goodman et al, 2016) A unique concern that has emerged with transcranial electrical stimulation techniques, is that the simplicity, low-cost nature of, and public access to the technology has lead to the emergence of a popular do-it-yourself movement where individuals participate in selfexperimentation without oversight. Such data is not part of well-designed experimental protocols (Fitz & Reiner, 2015;Riggall et al, 2015;Wexler, 2016). An additional worrisome aspect of this movement is that no studies have investigated yet the long-term effects associated with tDCS chronic use (for further reading please see http://www.ifcn.info/uploadfiles/documents/2015/Using_tES_devices_as_DIY_FINAL_13Dec1 5.pdf).…”
Section: Caveats and Considerations For The Futurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Goodman et al, 2016) A unique concern that has emerged with transcranial electrical stimulation techniques, is that the simplicity, low-cost nature of, and public access to the technology has lead to the emergence of a popular do-it-yourself movement where individuals participate in selfexperimentation without oversight. Such data is not part of well-designed experimental protocols (Fitz & Reiner, 2015;Riggall et al, 2015;Wexler, 2016). An additional worrisome aspect of this movement is that no studies have investigated yet the long-term effects associated with tDCS chronic use (for further reading please see http://www.ifcn.info/uploadfiles/documents/2015/Using_tES_devices_as_DIY_FINAL_13Dec1 5.pdf).…”
Section: Caveats and Considerations For The Futurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Simple transcranial electrical stimulation (tDCS) devices are available to consumers at relatively low cost and regulation is minimal 100 . Given the public interest in this method and the rudimentary state of knowledge about its effects, it is crucial that the safety and efficiacy of these methods are established.…”
Section: Boxmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such considerations would of course need to be supported by expert ad stakeholder opinions and by empirical research data in order to produce a well-informed and evidence-based policy. A good policy would ultimately engage regulators, scientists and the DIY community in crafting policy proposals that ensure public safety while still supporting (DIY) tDCS innovation [42].…”
Section: Ethical Legal and Societal Aspectsmentioning
confidence: 99%