2014
DOI: 10.1111/eve.12192
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The challenge of diagnosing soft tissue injuries in the palmar aspect of the carpus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The number of anatomical structures, combined with the structural change of muscle‐to‐tendon, make this a complex region (Jorgensen et al., 2010; Nagy & Dyson, 2014). Fortunately, technological progress has increased the use of ultrasonography in veterinary medicine; thus, the identification of specific injuries in the palmar carpal region is now possible (Shields et al., 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The number of anatomical structures, combined with the structural change of muscle‐to‐tendon, make this a complex region (Jorgensen et al., 2010; Nagy & Dyson, 2014). Fortunately, technological progress has increased the use of ultrasonography in veterinary medicine; thus, the identification of specific injuries in the palmar carpal region is now possible (Shields et al., 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The palmar aspect of the carpal region is only occasionally recognised as a cause of lameness (Nagy & Dyson, 2014). Clinical signs of injuries to the palmar aspect of the carpus include swelling, reduced range of motion, pain on flexion and lameness (Dyson, 2011; Jorgensen et al., 2010; Taintor et al., 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[8][9][10] Ultrasonography is limited by the available field of view within joints, preventing adequate examination of certain carpal ligaments (radiocarpal, palmar intercarpal, and carpometacarpal ligaments). 6,11 Computed tomography and MRI are used in both human and veterinary medicine to better assess the osseous and soft tissue structures of complex joints like the carpus [12][13][14] or tarsus. 15 Historically, CT was considered superior for visualizing bone and MRI for soft tissue structures 16 ; however, with the application of arthrography, good quality images outlining the joint cartilage, intraarticular ligamentous structures, 17 menisci, osteochondral lesions, and loose bodies [18][19][20] can be produced using both modalities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, direct visualization of cartilage cannot be obtained in radiography with only periarticular and subchondral changes discernible 8–10 . Ultrasonography is limited by the available field of view within joints, preventing adequate examination of certain carpal ligaments (radiocarpal, palmar intercarpal, and carpometacarpal ligaments) 6,11 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%