The Role of Business Ethics in Economic Performance 1998
DOI: 10.1057/9780230379794_8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Challenge of Ethical Investment: Activism, Assets and Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
17
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
5
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is consistent with the results of Matterson (2000), which showed that, although many investors valued social and environmental responsibility, fi nancial performance was still their main concern, a result that is also supported by the work of Sparkes (1998), who found that fi nancial returns are important for ethical investors.…”
Section: The Moderating Effect Of Corporate Financial Performance: Hysupporting
confidence: 92%
“…This is consistent with the results of Matterson (2000), which showed that, although many investors valued social and environmental responsibility, fi nancial performance was still their main concern, a result that is also supported by the work of Sparkes (1998), who found that fi nancial returns are important for ethical investors.…”
Section: The Moderating Effect Of Corporate Financial Performance: Hysupporting
confidence: 92%
“…For instance, according to research by Matterson (2000), while many investors admire social responsibility and ethics, money remains their primary concern. Other research by Sparkes (1998) found that 35% of respondents said they would invest ethically despite their returns being slightly lower than those of comparable conventional funds. Sparkes' research shows, however, that this percentage falls sharply if the return of ethical funds is significantly less than that of conventional funds.…”
Section: Framework and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…There has been a long lasting debate about the existence of a trade-off between financial return and SRI. Many studies have pointed out that SRI may be attractive for investors: Sparkes (1998), Nilsson (2009), and Beal et al (2005, even if it supposes a lower financial performance. Also using an experimental approach, Webley et al (2001) and Glac (2009) find evidence that some investors are willing to accept a trade-off between return and SRI.…”
Section: Measuring Investors' Socially Responsible Preferences In Mutmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…While shareholder advocacy has become a larger and increasingly important part of the overall SRI movement over the past years (Social Investment Forum, 2006) and has in the past gone hand-in-hand with social screening (Sparkes, 1998), shareholder advocacy will not be considered in this paper because the advocacy process is distinct from the screening process. Activism is more involved and the associated decisions include the performance of further actions in addition to choosing certain investments.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Activism is more involved and the associated decisions include the performance of further actions in addition to choosing certain investments. For example, investors have to overcome certain procedural hurdles to submit shareholder resolutions and might have to initiate lawsuits to enforce their legal rights (Domini, 1994;Sparkes, 1998). This might be associated with significant time involvement as well as additional financial sacrifice.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%