1998
DOI: 10.1080/0954412989306
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The challenge of managing organizational change: Exploring the relationship of re-engineering, developing learning organizations and total quality management

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
45
0
3

Year Published

2000
2000
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
45
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Studies by Dervitsiotis (1998) and De Cock (1998), point to the high costs associated with the traditionally high failure rates of organisational reengineering projects. Reynolds (1994) quotes a study by Gateway Information Services, a New York based consulting firm, which revealed a 70 percent failure rate for corporate reengineering and cultural change programs.…”
Section: The Impact Of Resistance On Implementationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies by Dervitsiotis (1998) and De Cock (1998), point to the high costs associated with the traditionally high failure rates of organisational reengineering projects. Reynolds (1994) quotes a study by Gateway Information Services, a New York based consulting firm, which revealed a 70 percent failure rate for corporate reengineering and cultural change programs.…”
Section: The Impact Of Resistance On Implementationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They are those containing the view by the different authors and models cited, which we used for our research. This research also includes the learning category because, although it does not appear as such in the other works cited, it is interesting due to the recent studies in quality management pointing out its relevance (Anderson, Rungtusanatham and Schoroeder, 1994;Sitkin, Sutcliffe and Schoroeder, 1994;Hackman and Wageman, 1995;Dervitsiotis, 1998), and it also includes the 2000 review of the EFQM model (EFQM, 2000).…”
Section: Critical Factors In Quality Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Failure in the implementation of a quality management system can be the result of a lack of clear goals, unrealistic team expectations, inadequate management support, no implementation strategy or limited training (Dawson, 1995). In the implementation of a quality management system, it is recommended that management change an organization to a form that is flexible, agile, adaptable, responsive and value-adding (Dervitsiotis, 1998). Silva et al (2014) argued that many studies insist on assuming one dichotomous situation, namely, the presence or absence of cooperation (in that specific case: Type I change and Type II change in the organizational field).…”
Section: Strengths Examplementioning
confidence: 99%